<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PANOS 4.1.0 has a major FLAW in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41093#M30191</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am on single unit of PA-5060 using PAN OS 4.1.2 for 20 hours seem to be all right with 5,000 users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let's see how it will be when 1,000 more users came back from vacation on next week.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks to PAN Support Team who finally solve a lot of issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(^_^)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Songkrant&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:08:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>songkrant</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-20T19:08:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PANOS 4.1.0 has a major FLAW</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41083#M30181</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;where do should I get support&amp;nbsp; to fix a critical ad major issue with PA 5050 running 4.1.0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When issuing&amp;nbsp; "commit" command the unit drop connenctions and teh arp tables get corrupted for about 30 minutes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As far as PaloAlto Support the issues is major and was discovered two weeks ago when troubleshooting with CB but the fix won't be available for anotehr 6 weeks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think that is not fair and someone need to Tell Nir Zuk we need fast response because one of teh reason I dropped Checkpoint 8 years ago was because of lack of response to customer and the turn around on fixing bugs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 03:40:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41083#M30181</guid>
      <dc:creator>mharb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-06T03:40:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PANOS 4.1.0 has a major FLAW</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41084#M30182</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Thank you for sharing this information. we're mass-deploying 4.1 and our 5050 pair is next.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 07:51:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41084#M30182</guid>
      <dc:creator>essnet</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-06T07:51:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PANOS 4.1.0 has a major FLAW</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41085#M30183</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you asked if there is a hotfix?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:55:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41085#M30183</guid>
      <dc:creator>mharding</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-06T13:55:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PANOS 4.1.0 has a major FLAW</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41086#M30184</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If anyone will find firewall vendor which cares about its customers, please let me know :smileylaugh:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:10:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41086#M30184</guid>
      <dc:creator>SimasK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-06T14:10:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PANOS 4.1.0 has a major FLAW</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41087#M30185</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp; I'm very sorry that you are experiencing issues with 4.1.&amp;nbsp; Can you message me with your support case number so that I can research this and assist you in getting resolution?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:03:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41087#M30185</guid>
      <dc:creator>mbenoit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-06T18:03:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PANOS 4.1.0 has a major FLAW</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41088#M30186</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Thanks for the heads up.&amp;nbsp; Was going to upgrade a pair of PA 2020s and begin deployment of PA 5050s using 4.1.&amp;nbsp; The PA 2020 upgrade will wait.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The PA 5050 deployment will be on hold.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:04:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41088#M30186</guid>
      <dc:creator>jloehndorf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-06T20:04:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PANOS 4.1.0 has a major FLAW</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41089#M30187</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the info.&amp;nbsp; Palo Alto Support people, if you have such a critical bug you should pull the update.&amp;nbsp; Having a major issue like this is going to cause everyone major issues when it can be avoided.&amp;nbsp; I will delay our rollout as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 22:22:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41089#M30187</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelBurgener</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-06T22:22:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PANOS 4.1.0 has a major FLAW</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41090#M30188</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We're running 4.1.0 on an active/active pa5050 pair.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have shut down one pa5050 due to asymetric routing issues that are&amp;nbsp; my fault&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;( addressed in a PA OSPF tech note -&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-1939"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-1939&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; ). Lots of non-syn-tcp streams.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I sometimes see commit problems with my ospf routers (Cisco, Avaya) connected to the PA's, mostly when I make Device -&amp;gt; Interface changes. They were especially annoying when both PA's were active. Panorama policy pushes don't seem to cause these hiccups.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm intending to upgrade to 4.1.1, hopefully tomorrow morning.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 03:24:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41090#M30188</guid>
      <dc:creator>john.croft</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-07T03:24:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PANOS 4.1.0 has a major FLAW</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41091#M30189</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;According to this doc: &lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-1982"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-1982&lt;/A&gt; 4.1.1 may not have the fix :smileygrin:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 12:22:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41091#M30189</guid>
      <dc:creator>essnet</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-07T12:22:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PANOS 4.1.0 has a major FLAW</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41092#M30190</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has this been resolved yet?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41092#M30190</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-08T16:39:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PANOS 4.1.0 has a major FLAW</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41093#M30191</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am on single unit of PA-5060 using PAN OS 4.1.2 for 20 hours seem to be all right with 5,000 users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let's see how it will be when 1,000 more users came back from vacation on next week.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks to PAN Support Team who finally solve a lot of issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(^_^)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Songkrant&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:08:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41093#M30191</guid>
      <dc:creator>songkrant</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-20T19:08:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PANOS 4.1.0 has a major FLAW</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41094#M30192</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just wanted to say we're now running 4.1.4, with some PA Support provided workarounds (thanks JW).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Full Active/Active at two sites, ospf and commit problems gone too.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4.1.7 is sleighted to have all the workarounds included or fixed. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:43:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-4-1-0-has-a-major-flaw/m-p/41094#M30192</guid>
      <dc:creator>john.croft</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-22T00:43:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

