<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Come April will PA firewall be enough? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/come-april-will-pa-firewall-be-enough/m-p/42920#M31501</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to know if it is possible to create a rule to block all traffic from Windows XP clients to the internet, so we are a bit more secure &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:46:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mtijhoff</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-02-13T13:46:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Come April will PA firewall be enough?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/come-april-will-pa-firewall-be-enough/m-p/42919#M31500</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Like most people I know, everyone has at least 1 windows xp computer on their network. Due to the nature of our business we have a few (some due to legacy apps). But my question is that, come April and Microsoft's cut off point for support, will having one of these operating sytems behind a Palo Alto firewall that has Anti-virus and threat&amp;amp;app detection be enough? Obviously all the systems are running anti-virus. But if the media is to be believed come April the only way a Windows XP computer will be safe from attack is it if was completely offline. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whereas I like to think, if the firewall is secure enough and the rules are tightly controlled as to what is allowed in and out, it should not be a problem. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What are the communities thoughts on this? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:22:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/come-april-will-pa-firewall-be-enough/m-p/42919#M31500</guid>
      <dc:creator>JRussell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-13T10:22:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Come April will PA firewall be enough?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/come-april-will-pa-firewall-be-enough/m-p/42920#M31501</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to know if it is possible to create a rule to block all traffic from Windows XP clients to the internet, so we are a bit more secure &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:46:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/come-april-will-pa-firewall-be-enough/m-p/42920#M31501</guid>
      <dc:creator>mtijhoff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-13T13:46:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Come April will PA firewall be enough?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/come-april-will-pa-firewall-be-enough/m-p/42921#M31502</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;my opinion is that PA-antivirus and threat&amp;amp;app detection for XP-Clients is best what could be done if XP needs access to the internet because the protection will be updated often. To prevent access for XP a custom-app could be created searching for "Windows NT 5.1" in the user-agent of http-get-request. otherwise all IP's should be known.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/come-april-will-pa-firewall-be-enough/m-p/42921#M31502</guid>
      <dc:creator>kdd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-13T15:44:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Come April will PA firewall be enough?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/come-april-will-pa-firewall-be-enough/m-p/42922#M31503</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;JRussell,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have done some root analysis associated with Wildfire triggered events and one of the largest causes is the clicking&amp;nbsp; of links in personal based email services (hotmail, yahoo-email and general webmail services).&amp;nbsp; These accounted for 40 - 45% of our sample base of over 400 events. The other big category is drivebuys while doing non work related surfing.&amp;nbsp; An approach to address these two major risks, especially for XP computers, would greatly reduce the incremental risk to those computers post April 2014. By using the capabilities of&amp;nbsp; PA more forcefully (especially for XP hosts) you can reduce the risk to them from internet based threats.&amp;nbsp; Understanding that you can globally block web-mail while allowing business required access to web-mail via AD group membership.&amp;nbsp; I hope this provides some ideas to work with.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Phil&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 01:10:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/come-april-will-pa-firewall-be-enough/m-p/42922#M31503</guid>
      <dc:creator>HITSSEC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-14T01:10:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Come April will PA firewall be enough?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/come-april-will-pa-firewall-be-enough/m-p/42923#M31504</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I agree with HitsSec that the primary threats will be the webmail and web browsing.&amp;nbsp; So these can continue to be mitigated via the standards settings you deploy on the Palo Alto.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And April is not really any different than today.&amp;nbsp; The real difference starts to build in May the first month without new updates.&amp;nbsp; And the degree of the boost is only as large as the number of NEW vulnerabilities found and patched everywhere but on XP.&amp;nbsp; Then this threat will continue to build as each month passes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Everyone will have to make their determination of how large that risk is compared to the expense of migration for the affected workstations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 02:00:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/come-april-will-pa-firewall-be-enough/m-p/42923#M31504</guid>
      <dc:creator>pulukas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-14T02:00:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

