<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: fqdn - policies - wildcard in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/fqdn-policies-wildcard/m-p/43678#M32049</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The FQDN in an address object (instead of IP address) will be resolved into an ip address during commit (and then refreshed every 20 minutes or so).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would recommend you to avoid using FQDN in your address objects and instead redesign your network so your lab-pc's is on the same (or a few) /24 networks (or how large you need) and then set the security policy based on iprange. Perhaps in combination with userid (either through pan-agent or by captive portal).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 23:04:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mikand</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-08-20T23:04:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>fqdn - policies - wildcard</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/fqdn-policies-wildcard/m-p/43677#M32048</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i want to place a policy with fqdn entrys completed with wildcards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;e.g.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our PCs have names like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LABPC01, LABPC02, LABPC03&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now i want to deny the internet traffic for every PC with the name LABPC*&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But i also want to allow it to a special list of pcs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wanted to use a policy with fqdn entrys - but i'm not allowed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When i want to do an address object, an error occurs: The value does not fit the validation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someone please help me out?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;axel &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:01:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/fqdn-policies-wildcard/m-p/43677#M32048</guid>
      <dc:creator>axel5le</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-14T14:01:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: fqdn - policies - wildcard</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/fqdn-policies-wildcard/m-p/43678#M32049</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The FQDN in an address object (instead of IP address) will be resolved into an ip address during commit (and then refreshed every 20 minutes or so).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would recommend you to avoid using FQDN in your address objects and instead redesign your network so your lab-pc's is on the same (or a few) /24 networks (or how large you need) and then set the security policy based on iprange. Perhaps in combination with userid (either through pan-agent or by captive portal).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 23:04:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/fqdn-policies-wildcard/m-p/43678#M32049</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-20T23:04:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

