<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: What possible reason cause MP CPU higher after integrate with Panorama in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-possible-reason-cause-mp-cpu-higher-after-integrate-with/m-p/43884#M32219</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, mschuricht,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you, I got it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have not open a case yet, but I will.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help again, ^_^&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sample &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 02:07:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>paloalto.netfos</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-02-08T02:07:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>What possible reason cause MP CPU higher after integrate with Panorama</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-possible-reason-cause-mp-cpu-higher-after-integrate-with/m-p/43878#M32213</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As this article's title, I setup a Panorama to collect the logs from a PA-2050.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But, when I complete the integration between Panorama and PA-2050, the CPU percentage of&amp;nbsp; Management Plane become higher.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Before the integration, the MP CPU is lower then 15%. One month later, the average keeps about 59%, sometimes higher then 60%.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But I check the system log and cannot find any question, please give me some suggestions or experiences to troubleshoot it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I upload an attach file, it's the MRTG graph.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sample Wu&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 16:51:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-possible-reason-cause-mp-cpu-higher-after-integrate-with/m-p/43878#M32213</guid>
      <dc:creator>paloalto.netfos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-06T16:51:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What possible reason cause MP CPU higher after integrate with Panorama</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-possible-reason-cause-mp-cpu-higher-after-integrate-with/m-p/43879#M32214</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This could be related to log forwarding.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you forwarding logs to Panorama?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:10:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-possible-reason-cause-mp-cpu-higher-after-integrate-with/m-p/43879#M32214</guid>
      <dc:creator>mschuricht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-06T17:10:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What possible reason cause MP CPU higher after integrate with Panorama</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-possible-reason-cause-mp-cpu-higher-after-integrate-with/m-p/43880#M32215</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, mschuricht,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, but I didn't see this situation in other PAN firewall that integrated with Panorama.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In normal, the MP CPU should not be so high, right ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:18:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-possible-reason-cause-mp-cpu-higher-after-integrate-with/m-p/43880#M32215</guid>
      <dc:creator>paloalto.netfos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-06T17:18:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What possible reason cause MP CPU higher after integrate with Panorama</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-possible-reason-cause-mp-cpu-higher-after-integrate-with/m-p/43881#M32216</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It all depends on how much traffic is being seen by the device, how many logs/sec are being forwarded (based on Policy), and is also related to the firewall platform. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:27:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-possible-reason-cause-mp-cpu-higher-after-integrate-with/m-p/43881#M32216</guid>
      <dc:creator>mschuricht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-06T17:27:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What possible reason cause MP CPU higher after integrate with Panorama</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-possible-reason-cause-mp-cpu-higher-after-integrate-with/m-p/43882#M32217</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, mschuricht,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply, but I'm still confused.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you mean that it's may be a normal situation in PA2050 because it's hardware performance limitation when PA2050 must process huge traffic and forward logs at the same time ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my uploaded MRTG graph, the traffic became lower and DP CPU was decreasing after 12th January, but the MP CPU still keep in a high percent. How can I do to make the MP CPU become lower ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sample&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 13:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-possible-reason-cause-mp-cpu-higher-after-integrate-with/m-p/43882#M32217</guid>
      <dc:creator>paloalto.netfos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-07T13:13:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What possible reason cause MP CPU higher after integrate with Panorama</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-possible-reason-cause-mp-cpu-higher-after-integrate-with/m-p/43883#M32218</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not exactly. I mean that you cannot really compare a PA-2050 deployed in one location with the performance of another in a different location. The traffic passing through the box will likely differ and so will the policy. If you want to do a comparison it should be apples to apples with the same traffic and policy applied.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you run "debug log-receiver statistics" to get a sense for how many logs/sec are being processed by the device?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you opened a case to have TAC take a look? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:18:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-possible-reason-cause-mp-cpu-higher-after-integrate-with/m-p/43883#M32218</guid>
      <dc:creator>mschuricht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-07T17:18:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What possible reason cause MP CPU higher after integrate with Panorama</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-possible-reason-cause-mp-cpu-higher-after-integrate-with/m-p/43884#M32219</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, mschuricht,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you, I got it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have not open a case yet, but I will.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help again, ^_^&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sample &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 02:07:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-possible-reason-cause-mp-cpu-higher-after-integrate-with/m-p/43884#M32219</guid>
      <dc:creator>paloalto.netfos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-08T02:07:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What possible reason cause MP CPU higher after integrate with Panorama</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-possible-reason-cause-mp-cpu-higher-after-integrate-with/m-p/43885#M32220</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also which PANOS version is used?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The PA-2000 series have some issues with mgmtplane which compared to PA-3000 series is much slower which of course could bring you a higher cpu usage. As long as this doesnt reach 100% you should be safe.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There have also been some issues addressed regarding mgmtplane and performance in the later releases of 4.1 and 5.0 series.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 03:13:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-possible-reason-cause-mp-cpu-higher-after-integrate-with/m-p/43885#M32220</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-09T03:13:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

