<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Policy Based Forwarding and global protect in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/policy-based-forwarding-and-global-protect/m-p/44594#M32727</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello people,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a PBF problem and can not solve it without help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My PA-500 firewall have dual ISP links. One of them is for users,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and uses normal routing. The other one is for testing purposes,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I use PBF to route few machines through other ISP link and it&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;works fine. However, what I failed to do is global protect service&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on this second link (PBF next hop interface), can not even ping&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;from internet IP address on this link. I suppose that the problem is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;with routing, because my default route points to other link where the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;rest of users go and IP adress to which I connect is IP address on the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;router itself not IP address behind router (traffic is not going through the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;router when I connect with global protect or when I try to ping, it is destined&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to the router itself). I tried to find workaround with PBF, not worked. I even added&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;another default route with higher metric that point to this interface, still not working.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any idea or suggestion ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 08:58:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mbajagic</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-13T08:58:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Policy Based Forwarding and global protect</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/policy-based-forwarding-and-global-protect/m-p/44594#M32727</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello people,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a PBF problem and can not solve it without help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My PA-500 firewall have dual ISP links. One of them is for users,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and uses normal routing. The other one is for testing purposes,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I use PBF to route few machines through other ISP link and it&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;works fine. However, what I failed to do is global protect service&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on this second link (PBF next hop interface), can not even ping&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;from internet IP address on this link. I suppose that the problem is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;with routing, because my default route points to other link where the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;rest of users go and IP adress to which I connect is IP address on the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;router itself not IP address behind router (traffic is not going through the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;router when I connect with global protect or when I try to ping, it is destined&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to the router itself). I tried to find workaround with PBF, not worked. I even added&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;another default route with higher metric that point to this interface, still not working.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any idea or suggestion ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 08:58:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/policy-based-forwarding-and-global-protect/m-p/44594#M32727</guid>
      <dc:creator>mbajagic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-13T08:58:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Policy Based Forwarding and global protect</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/policy-based-forwarding-and-global-protect/m-p/44595#M32728</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you assign both ISP connections on the same security zone?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:31:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/policy-based-forwarding-and-global-protect/m-p/44595#M32728</guid>
      <dc:creator>rmonvon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-13T22:31:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Policy Based Forwarding and global protect</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/policy-based-forwarding-and-global-protect/m-p/44596#M32729</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No I did not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:29:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/policy-based-forwarding-and-global-protect/m-p/44596#M32729</guid>
      <dc:creator>mbajagic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-14T17:29:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

