<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PPPoE in A/P configuration in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pppoe-in-a-p-configuration/m-p/45662#M33556</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just checking this will work:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;users---[switch]---[a/p ha pa500's]---[switch]---ntu&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So the service provider requires a PPPoE client to use the link.&amp;nbsp; The SP only allows one port on the NTU to be used and only supports a single PPPoE session.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can the PA500's in A/P HA happily maintain this PPPoE session?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Richard&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 05:40:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RichardThornton</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-07-02T05:40:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PPPoE in A/P configuration</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pppoe-in-a-p-configuration/m-p/45662#M33556</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just checking this will work:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;users---[switch]---[a/p ha pa500's]---[switch]---ntu&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So the service provider requires a PPPoE client to use the link.&amp;nbsp; The SP only allows one port on the NTU to be used and only supports a single PPPoE session.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can the PA500's in A/P HA happily maintain this PPPoE session?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Richard&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 05:40:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pppoe-in-a-p-configuration/m-p/45662#M33556</guid>
      <dc:creator>RichardThornton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-02T05:40:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PPPoE in A/P configuration</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pppoe-in-a-p-configuration/m-p/45663#M33557</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe the answer to your question is here:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-1785"&gt;Technical Details Regarding PPPoE Support&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Failover&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Passive device will take over the PPPoE connection from Active device when failover happens&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;There is no need to re-connect PPPoE at Passive device when failover happens&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 06:46:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pppoe-in-a-p-configuration/m-p/45663#M33557</guid>
      <dc:creator>emr_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-02T06:46:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

