<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Multiple Global Protect Gateways on One Physical Interface in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multiple-global-protect-gateways-on-one-physical-interface/m-p/4551#M3356</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is it possible to create a setup where two separate GlobalProtect Gateways are listeningn on the same physical interface? It's clear that they cannot be running on the same public IP address, but how about if I'm allocating separate IP addresses for both gateways? I tried this, but the problem seems to be that I cannot allocate two public IP addresses of the same subnet on the same virtual router. Is the only workaround to create a separate virtual router?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Petteri Heinonen&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:51:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>itsup</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-03-10T07:51:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple Global Protect Gateways on One Physical Interface</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multiple-global-protect-gateways-on-one-physical-interface/m-p/4551#M3356</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is it possible to create a setup where two separate GlobalProtect Gateways are listeningn on the same physical interface? It's clear that they cannot be running on the same public IP address, but how about if I'm allocating separate IP addresses for both gateways? I tried this, but the problem seems to be that I cannot allocate two public IP addresses of the same subnet on the same virtual router. Is the only workaround to create a separate virtual router?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Petteri Heinonen&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 07:51:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multiple-global-protect-gateways-on-one-physical-interface/m-p/4551#M3356</guid>
      <dc:creator>itsup</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-10T07:51:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple Global Protect Gateways on One Physical Interface</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multiple-global-protect-gateways-on-one-physical-interface/m-p/4552#M3357</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Found the solution. Simply create additional loopback interfaces, assign the needed IP adresses (with a mask of /32) to those, and then add the loopback interface(s) to the virtual router.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 12:45:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multiple-global-protect-gateways-on-one-physical-interface/m-p/4552#M3357</guid>
      <dc:creator>itsup</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-27T12:45:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

