<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Same model for HA to functional properly? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/same-model-for-ha-to-functional-properly/m-p/46293#M34024</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ideally the HA would not establish with the change in platform per the software. With change in minor release of software version it should be fine to work for HA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 15:13:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Phoenix</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-09-09T15:13:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Same model for HA to functional properly?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/same-model-for-ha-to-functional-properly/m-p/46292#M34023</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understand that both firewalls should have the same feature licensing for proper failover, but has anyone implemented HA successfully using two different models? 5050 and 5020 for example? I know in the documentation it states both models must be the same. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 14:42:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/same-model-for-ha-to-functional-properly/m-p/46292#M34023</guid>
      <dc:creator>LouisScaringella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-09T14:42:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Same model for HA to functional properly?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/same-model-for-ha-to-functional-properly/m-p/46293#M34024</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ideally the HA would not establish with the change in platform per the software. With change in minor release of software version it should be fine to work for HA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 15:13:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/same-model-for-ha-to-functional-properly/m-p/46293#M34024</guid>
      <dc:creator>Phoenix</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-09T15:13:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

