<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Could IPsecVPN use PBF instead of routing? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/could-ipsecvpn-use-pbf-instead-of-routing/m-p/46605#M34261</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Roh,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a similar scenario PBF with IPSec VPN's ..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it working fine for you.. if so can u please share a document or config of it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Raj&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 12:20:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rparamati</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-15T12:20:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Could IPsecVPN use PBF instead of routing?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/could-ipsecvpn-use-pbf-instead-of-routing/m-p/46602#M34258</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello guys.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a question about IPSEC VPN tunnel and is IPSEC VPN can use PBF instead of routing or not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think that tunnel interface could have ip-address (for tunnel monitoring) so I guess IPSEC VPN tunnel could use PBF instead of routing?!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I tested about that but its faild. so I wonder about it caused my missed configuration or PAN could not support IPSEC VPN with PBF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please let me know above question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Roh.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 02:11:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/could-ipsecvpn-use-pbf-instead-of-routing/m-p/46602#M34258</guid>
      <dc:creator>ttongfly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-13T02:11:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Could IPsecVPN use PBF instead of routing?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/could-ipsecvpn-use-pbf-instead-of-routing/m-p/46603#M34259</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In order to get this to work properly, you need to have 2 VR's with routes, and then the PBF will overide the routes. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:03:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/could-ipsecvpn-use-pbf-instead-of-routing/m-p/46603#M34259</guid>
      <dc:creator>jdelio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-18T00:03:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Could IPsecVPN use PBF instead of routing?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/could-ipsecvpn-use-pbf-instead-of-routing/m-p/46604#M34260</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello jdelio&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tested again and then PBF was worked properly for IPsecVPN traffic and missed configuration when PBF not to do.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Roh.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:05:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/could-ipsecvpn-use-pbf-instead-of-routing/m-p/46604#M34260</guid>
      <dc:creator>ttongfly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-18T01:05:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Could IPsecVPN use PBF instead of routing?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/could-ipsecvpn-use-pbf-instead-of-routing/m-p/46605#M34261</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Roh,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a similar scenario PBF with IPSec VPN's ..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it working fine for you.. if so can u please share a document or config of it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Raj&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 12:20:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/could-ipsecvpn-use-pbf-instead-of-routing/m-p/46605#M34261</guid>
      <dc:creator>rparamati</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-15T12:20:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Could IPsecVPN use PBF instead of routing?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/could-ipsecvpn-use-pbf-instead-of-routing/m-p/46606#M34262</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello rparamati.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately I don't have sample configuration for IPSecVPN with PBF that I tested. You can configure the IP to tunnel interface of both side of PAN and forward the traffic to tunnel interface using PBF rule.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I have a chance to have testing IPSecVPN with PBF again, I will provide you a configuration of PAN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Roh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 08:00:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/could-ipsecvpn-use-pbf-instead-of-routing/m-p/46606#M34262</guid>
      <dc:creator>Retired Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-16T08:00:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

