<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Virtual wire for two different VLANs! in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wire-for-two-different-vlans/m-p/4794#M3534</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Below is the answer for Native VLAN:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3b3b3b;"&gt;Setting a VLAN as a native VLAN on Cisco turns off tagging.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3b3b3b;"&gt;The PAN device has no concept of "Native VLAN". The logical interface assigned to the physical interface would be the interface to accept untagged vlans.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3b3b3b;"&gt;If the following interfaces are created:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3b3b3b;"&gt;Eth1/1 ---- Untagged Traffic &lt;BR /&gt;Eth1/1.100 --- Tagged with VLID = 100 &lt;BR /&gt;Eth1/1.200 --- Tagged with VLID = 200&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3b3b3b;"&gt;On the Cisco switch configure VLAN 200 to be the "Native VLAN", then the packets exiting the switch would have no tag. These packets would enter the PAN device on Eth1/1 because it is expecting untagged traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3b3b3b;"&gt;owner: skrall&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3b3b3b;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3b3b3b;"&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-2326"&gt;Native VLAN Configuration&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 15:19:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Besfort</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-08-20T15:19:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Virtual wire for two different VLANs!</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wire-for-two-different-vlans/m-p/4788#M3528</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wanted to apply a virtual wire between two sub-interfaces 1.10 and 2.20, which are basically in two different VLAN ID (10 and 20), but I'm getting an error saying that sub-interfaces cannot have interfaces with different VLAN (10/20).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this the default behavior for virtual wire, or am I missing something?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-B&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 07:43:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wire-for-two-different-vlans/m-p/4788#M3528</guid>
      <dc:creator>Besfort</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-18T07:43:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Virtual wire for two different VLANs!</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wire-for-two-different-vlans/m-p/4789#M3529</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;or is there any option to set the vlan as native vlan ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:05:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wire-for-two-different-vlans/m-p/4789#M3529</guid>
      <dc:creator>Besfort</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-18T10:05:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Virtual wire for two different VLANs!</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wire-for-two-different-vlans/m-p/4790#M3530</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FIrst, vwire can only be configured between physical interfaces. After that you can configure Vwire sub interface per vlan.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Second, as Vwire is transparent, no reason for having different vlan on each interface &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope help&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;V.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:42:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wire-for-two-different-vlans/m-p/4790#M3530</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceM</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-18T11:42:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Virtual wire for two different VLANs!</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wire-for-two-different-vlans/m-p/4791#M3531</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;OK it's a misconfiguration on my network, because it doesn't make sense to have two different vlans.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It wont work even with the router, but router in this case is using the Native Vlan to accept all untagged traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;B&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 12:17:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wire-for-two-different-vlans/m-p/4791#M3531</guid>
      <dc:creator>Besfort</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-18T12:17:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Virtual wire for two different VLANs!</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wire-for-two-different-vlans/m-p/4792#M3532</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If question is answer, please to close it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Keep in mind, if you need to allow taggued vlan to go through vwire, you have to allow it:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="vwire.JPG.jpg" class="jiveImage" src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/legacyfs/online/14998_vwire.JPG.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope help&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;V.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 12:20:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wire-for-two-different-vlans/m-p/4792#M3532</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceM</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-18T12:20:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Virtual wire for two different VLANs!</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wire-for-two-different-vlans/m-p/4793#M3533</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you Vince.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 13:52:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wire-for-two-different-vlans/m-p/4793#M3533</guid>
      <dc:creator>Besfort</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-18T13:52:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Virtual wire for two different VLANs!</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wire-for-two-different-vlans/m-p/4794#M3534</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Below is the answer for Native VLAN:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3b3b3b;"&gt;Setting a VLAN as a native VLAN on Cisco turns off tagging.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3b3b3b;"&gt;The PAN device has no concept of "Native VLAN". The logical interface assigned to the physical interface would be the interface to accept untagged vlans.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3b3b3b;"&gt;If the following interfaces are created:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3b3b3b;"&gt;Eth1/1 ---- Untagged Traffic &lt;BR /&gt;Eth1/1.100 --- Tagged with VLID = 100 &lt;BR /&gt;Eth1/1.200 --- Tagged with VLID = 200&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3b3b3b;"&gt;On the Cisco switch configure VLAN 200 to be the "Native VLAN", then the packets exiting the switch would have no tag. These packets would enter the PAN device on Eth1/1 because it is expecting untagged traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3b3b3b;"&gt;owner: skrall&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3b3b3b;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3b3b3b;"&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-2326"&gt;Native VLAN Configuration&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 15:19:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wire-for-two-different-vlans/m-p/4794#M3534</guid>
      <dc:creator>Besfort</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-20T15:19:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Virtual wire for two different VLANs!</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wire-for-two-different-vlans/m-p/4795#M3535</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you've got two wires with different VLAN's chances are that you are running two different logical networks as well (ie. different ip networks). If, however, the same ip network is present on both VLAN's you can use L2 interfaces instead of vwire and then do VLAN translation between them. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BR,&lt;BR /&gt;Nicolai&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:05:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wire-for-two-different-vlans/m-p/4795#M3535</guid>
      <dc:creator>snaft</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-21T12:05:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

