<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic URL Filtering Profiles - Category/Action in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/url-filtering-profiles-category-action/m-p/50298#M37035</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm torn even asking this question, but it seems like it might be a nice feature but at the same time possibly misused. It might also be a support nightmare when people call saying they can't get to a URL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would you consider adding a "Block-No-Log" to the list of actions and the associated "block-no-log" response page for URL filtering? Suppose I want to block Web-Advertising, that would cause a great deal of logging and would make reporting a mess too. Simply because of the volume and much of it is not "requested" by a user-action. Having a "Block-No-Log" choice would simply block the URL and not log to the URL logs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The "block-no-log" response page would might simply be a small bit of text so the web pages load correctly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:15:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jmck9999</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-04-29T13:15:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>URL Filtering Profiles - Category/Action</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/url-filtering-profiles-category-action/m-p/50298#M37035</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm torn even asking this question, but it seems like it might be a nice feature but at the same time possibly misused. It might also be a support nightmare when people call saying they can't get to a URL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would you consider adding a "Block-No-Log" to the list of actions and the associated "block-no-log" response page for URL filtering? Suppose I want to block Web-Advertising, that would cause a great deal of logging and would make reporting a mess too. Simply because of the volume and much of it is not "requested" by a user-action. Having a "Block-No-Log" choice would simply block the URL and not log to the URL logs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The "block-no-log" response page would might simply be a small bit of text so the web pages load correctly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:15:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/url-filtering-profiles-category-action/m-p/50298#M37035</guid>
      <dc:creator>jmck9999</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-29T13:15:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: URL Filtering Profiles - Category/Action</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/url-filtering-profiles-category-action/m-p/50299#M37036</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We will put in a feature request for this funtionality.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 23:53:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/url-filtering-profiles-category-action/m-p/50299#M37036</guid>
      <dc:creator>nrice</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-29T23:53:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

