<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Captive portal users not in groups? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/captive-portal-users-not-in-groups/m-p/51495#M37881</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;For Kerberos, you need to create a user-group in the Local Database on the Palo Alto. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 20:27:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dwhyte</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-10-07T20:27:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Captive portal users not in groups?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/captive-portal-users-not-in-groups/m-p/51494#M37880</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are using the UserID agents on our servers for ID and groups.&amp;nbsp; Users that login via our AD domain on bound machines are correctly identified and we can apply policies based on group membership.&amp;nbsp; That all works very nicely.&amp;nbsp; We just put captive portal in place that uses Kerberos for authentication against AD.&amp;nbsp; Users are authenticated, but policies that are based on group membership are not applied. Is there a disconnect between the two sources that keeps the groups from applying to users that are authenticated via captive portal?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 20:15:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/captive-portal-users-not-in-groups/m-p/51494#M37880</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dshackelford</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-06T20:15:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Captive portal users not in groups?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/captive-portal-users-not-in-groups/m-p/51495#M37881</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;For Kerberos, you need to create a user-group in the Local Database on the Palo Alto. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 20:27:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/captive-portal-users-not-in-groups/m-p/51495#M37881</guid>
      <dc:creator>dwhyte</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-07T20:27:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Captive portal users not in groups?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/captive-portal-users-not-in-groups/m-p/51496#M37882</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I ended up doing was restricting the authentication profile for captive portal to specific groups, and that seems to make sure they ended up with the group memberships.&amp;nbsp; It was a better solution than I expected because it also restricted the captive portal use to only accounts that were people.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 21:00:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/captive-portal-users-not-in-groups/m-p/51496#M37882</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dshackelford</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-07T21:00:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

