<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic NAT DIPP fallbacks in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/nat-dipp-fallbacks/m-p/63599#M38250</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Im seeing &amp;nbsp;NAT DIPP fallbacks quite a lot relating to a NAT rule, theres does not appear anything not working so im wondering if its&amp;nbsp;somehting that im not noticing work.&amp;nbsp; Ocasionally it feels more sluggish that it should when browsing web pages but thats about the only thing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There only one nat on the firewalls its set to fall back to an interface address.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any suggesions appreciate.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:31:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Buccaneer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-08-25T14:31:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NAT DIPP fallbacks</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/nat-dipp-fallbacks/m-p/63599#M38250</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Im seeing &amp;nbsp;NAT DIPP fallbacks quite a lot relating to a NAT rule, theres does not appear anything not working so im wondering if its&amp;nbsp;somehting that im not noticing work.&amp;nbsp; Ocasionally it feels more sluggish that it should when browsing web pages but thats about the only thing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There only one nat on the firewalls its set to fall back to an interface address.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any suggesions appreciate.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:31:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/nat-dipp-fallbacks/m-p/63599#M38250</guid>
      <dc:creator>Buccaneer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-25T14:31:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT DIPP fallbacks</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/nat-dipp-fallbacks/m-p/63750#M38313</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;how many users are you having on how many IP addresses... could it be that your ports just get depleted by aggressive usage? Depending on the browsing habits of your crowd, could it be that you are simply getting short of ports? You will typically get about 64k concurrent sessions per IP, and only high-end platforms will support over-subscription...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think average user can peak to up to thousand ports easily, aggressive users... lot more than that. Check on that first &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Luciano&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 21:13:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/nat-dipp-fallbacks/m-p/63750#M38313</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lucky</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-27T21:13:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

