<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PA-7050 LACP causing delay in fail-over times in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-7050-lacp-causing-delay-in-fail-over-times/m-p/65304#M39001</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;By playing with switch side LACP and Spanning-Tree timers, you can probably achieve 1-4 seconds failover.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yet dont look for instant/no loss failover with LACP on PANOS, this may come in next release. If you need absolutly transparent/least impact then switch back to non-LACP aggregation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:38:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cpainchaud</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-09-30T15:38:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PA-7050 LACP causing delay in fail-over times</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-7050-lacp-causing-delay-in-fail-over-times/m-p/65302#M38999</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have an HA A/P PA-7050 cluster running 7.0.2 with QNPC (40G). The 40G links are bundled in AE1 with LACP enabled. We noticed during testing that LACP causes 8-10 ping loss during a fail-over event. With LACP disabled we have a 1 ping loss during fail-over events.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The LACP settings we have are the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/526i37BB6DF8C793F777/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="lacp.jpg" title="lacp.jpg" /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The remote side has been verified to reflect&amp;nbsp;a compatible&amp;nbsp;setup to this. Has anyone else noticed this issue?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:15:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-7050-lacp-causing-delay-in-fail-over-times/m-p/65302#M38999</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gun-Slinger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-30T15:15:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-7050 LACP causing delay in fail-over times</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-7050-lacp-causing-delay-in-fail-over-times/m-p/65304#M39001</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;By playing with switch side LACP and Spanning-Tree timers, you can probably achieve 1-4 seconds failover.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yet dont look for instant/no loss failover with LACP on PANOS, this may come in next release. If you need absolutly transparent/least impact then switch back to non-LACP aggregation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:38:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-7050-lacp-causing-delay-in-fail-over-times/m-p/65304#M39001</guid>
      <dc:creator>cpainchaud</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-30T15:38:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-7050 LACP causing delay in fail-over times</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-7050-lacp-causing-delay-in-fail-over-times/m-p/65306#M39003</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks cpainchaud,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We will be disabling LACP until this feature is optimized.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:52:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-7050-lacp-causing-delay-in-fail-over-times/m-p/65306#M39003</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gun-Slinger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-30T15:52:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-7050 LACP causing delay in fail-over times</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-7050-lacp-causing-delay-in-fail-over-times/m-p/65307#M39004</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm currently configuring an aggregate link (2x 10Gb) to a Nexus switch with LACP enabled and we have the exact same problem. What I don't understand is that the LACP negotiation seems fast enough, but then traffic does not go through for a couple of seconds. I'll check with the telecom team if they can tweak some timers as suggested.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Benjamin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:01:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-7050-lacp-causing-delay-in-fail-over-times/m-p/65307#M39004</guid>
      <dc:creator>BenjAudy.MTL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-30T16:01:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-7050 LACP causing delay in fail-over times</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-7050-lacp-causing-delay-in-fail-over-times/m-p/65310#M39005</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you heard something to that effect (instant/no loss failover in next release)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Benjamin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:03:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-7050-lacp-causing-delay-in-fail-over-times/m-p/65310#M39005</guid>
      <dc:creator>BenjAudy.MTL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-30T16:03:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-7050 LACP causing delay in fail-over times</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-7050-lacp-causing-delay-in-fail-over-times/m-p/65311#M39006</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As usual, this kind of info cannot be disclosed publicly. Please reach your PAN representative to obtain such aswer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Very sorry about that &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:05:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-7050-lacp-causing-delay-in-fail-over-times/m-p/65311#M39006</guid>
      <dc:creator>cpainchaud</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-30T16:05:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-7050 LACP causing delay in fail-over times</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-7050-lacp-causing-delay-in-fail-over-times/m-p/65312#M39007</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No problem, I'll check with my SE.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:14:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-7050-lacp-causing-delay-in-fail-over-times/m-p/65312#M39007</guid>
      <dc:creator>BenjAudy.MTL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-30T16:14:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-7050 LACP causing delay in fail-over times</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-7050-lacp-causing-delay-in-fail-over-times/m-p/117884#M45602</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Exact same issue for me as well. Currently testing PA-7050 with Cisco Nexus, 2x10G LACP. With PAN HA interface as Auto vs. Shutdown, there is zero to one ping drop. I had tested even with voice call going on and there is no service disruption. With LACP, it is 8-12 ping drops. Even after the peer is detected, it takes time to actually pass the traffic. I will check with my SE as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the PAN LACP recommended mode, Active or Passive?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 19:03:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-7050-lacp-causing-delay-in-fail-over-times/m-p/117884#M45602</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sly_Cooper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-05T19:03:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-7050 LACP causing delay in fail-over times</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-7050-lacp-causing-delay-in-fail-over-times/m-p/118492#M45636</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you have version 7.1.x ? There is a new feature to have LACP active on passive firewall node (Enable LACP active pre-negotiation for an HA passive firewall):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/documentation/71/pan-os/newfeaturesguide/networking-features/lacp-and-lldp-pre-negotiation-on-an-ha-passive-firewall#19978" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/documentation/71/pan-os/newfeaturesguide/networking-features/lacp-and-lldp-pre-negotiation-on-an-ha-passive-firewall#19978&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 19:21:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-7050-lacp-causing-delay-in-fail-over-times/m-p/118492#M45636</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anon1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-07T19:21:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

