<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Device Capacity Planning in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/device-capacity-planning/m-p/65553#M39124</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;all this features are using partly classic software calculation and partly specialized CPUs/ASICs/FPGAs .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So you should get numbers in between of the specs : 500MB encrypted vpn traffic + more for 'normal' traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;worst case scenario is you get 500MB but by experience I've never that low numbers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 18:22:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cpainchaud</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-10-06T18:22:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Device Capacity Planning</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/device-capacity-planning/m-p/65552#M39123</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to get my head around device throughput maximums. As an example the 3020 is speced as such:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2 Gbps firewall throughput&lt;BR /&gt;(App-ID enabled1)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;1 Gbps threat prevention throughput&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;500 Mbps IPSec VPN throughput&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are these throughputs simultaneous? In other words, can I have 2Gbps of Firewall through put and 500Mpbs of IPsec traffic, or if I have 500Mbps of IPsec traffic, am essentially depleted at that point?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The onset of more affordable high bandwidth is starting to cause concerns for some of our exisitng deployment; as well there is more need to have strict DMZ deployments where internal to server zone policies could see pretty heavy bandwidth demands.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any thoughts or experience would be appreicated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 18:07:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/device-capacity-planning/m-p/65552#M39123</guid>
      <dc:creator>dpayne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-06T18:07:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Device Capacity Planning</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/device-capacity-planning/m-p/65553#M39124</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;all this features are using partly classic software calculation and partly specialized CPUs/ASICs/FPGAs .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So you should get numbers in between of the specs : 500MB encrypted vpn traffic + more for 'normal' traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;worst case scenario is you get 500MB but by experience I've never that low numbers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 18:22:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/device-capacity-planning/m-p/65553#M39124</guid>
      <dc:creator>cpainchaud</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-06T18:22:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

