<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Commit issue - Error updating NAT IP pools in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/commit-issue-error-updating-nat-ip-pools/m-p/5342#M3929</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Seems the second last commit was failed and a NAT Rule from there was the issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Changing the NAT IP pool from x.x.x.0/26 to x.x.x.1 solved the issue (on a new rule from the second last commit). Since i am using "dynamic-ip-and-port", having just one ip is no big deal. But i am still asking me, why I am not able to define a /24 network as IP Pool. I am even more confused if i am looking at other NAT rules which have a /26 network as IP Pool. So, this shouldn't be a problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there somewhere a limit for IP Pool addresses?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 14:19:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>User_333</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-02T14:19:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Commit issue - Error updating NAT IP pools</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/commit-issue-error-updating-nat-ip-pools/m-p/5341#M3928</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;After updating Policy and Nat Rules, I got the follow commit errors:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Error: Error: Error updating NAT IP pools&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Error: response from cfgpush.s1.dp1.comm.cfg-dp: Error updating NAT IP pools&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This error still occurs if i disable (or even delete) the newly added rules. Since i did a commit ~10min before, i am sure, i didn't changed anything else.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, i am looking for an advanced command which gives me more info (which object causes this error). Hope somebody can help me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 12:59:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/commit-issue-error-updating-nat-ip-pools/m-p/5341#M3928</guid>
      <dc:creator>User_333</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-02T12:59:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Commit issue - Error updating NAT IP pools</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/commit-issue-error-updating-nat-ip-pools/m-p/5342#M3929</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Seems the second last commit was failed and a NAT Rule from there was the issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Changing the NAT IP pool from x.x.x.0/26 to x.x.x.1 solved the issue (on a new rule from the second last commit). Since i am using "dynamic-ip-and-port", having just one ip is no big deal. But i am still asking me, why I am not able to define a /24 network as IP Pool. I am even more confused if i am looking at other NAT rules which have a /26 network as IP Pool. So, this shouldn't be a problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there somewhere a limit for IP Pool addresses?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 14:19:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/commit-issue-error-updating-nat-ip-pools/m-p/5342#M3929</guid>
      <dc:creator>User_333</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-02T14:19:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

