<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Why connections count of ASA is much more than PA's ? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-connections-count-of-asa-is-much-more-than-pa-s/m-p/67151#M39435</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I use V-Wire between ASA and core switch.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I found the connections count of ASA is much more than PA's.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know how to explain about this ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;IMG src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/925i3881F93642F8E20E/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="01.jpg" title="01.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:28:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>neilwu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-10-22T17:28:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why connections count of ASA is much more than PA's ?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-connections-count-of-asa-is-much-more-than-pa-s/m-p/67151#M39435</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I use V-Wire between ASA and core switch.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I found the connections count of ASA is much more than PA's.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know how to explain about this ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;IMG src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/925i3881F93642F8E20E/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="01.jpg" title="01.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:28:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-connections-count-of-asa-is-much-more-than-pa-s/m-p/67151#M39435</guid>
      <dc:creator>neilwu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-22T17:28:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why connections count of ASA is much more than PA's ?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-connections-count-of-asa-is-much-more-than-pa-s/m-p/67156#M39438</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Someone can correct me if I remember this incorrectly, however the way the two devices report are different. I beleive the way the ASA reports is by rule hits while the PAN uses Sessions. So the ASA may have more than the PAN. I recall this when purchasing the current PAN's and trying to size them appropriatly.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 18:31:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-connections-count-of-asa-is-much-more-than-pa-s/m-p/67156#M39438</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-22T18:31:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why connections count of ASA is much more than PA's ?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-connections-count-of-asa-is-much-more-than-pa-s/m-p/67161#M39443</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;funny, i usually experience the contrary&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 18:49:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-connections-count-of-asa-is-much-more-than-pa-s/m-p/67161#M39443</guid>
      <dc:creator>cpainchaud</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-22T18:49:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why connections count of ASA is much more than PA's ?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-connections-count-of-asa-is-much-more-than-pa-s/m-p/67188#M39453</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The asa may be counting the 'connections per second' while the PAN will show you 'number of concurrently active sessions'&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;for more details you can run '&amp;gt; show session info' from the CLI which may show you the packetrate may be closer to the details of the ASA:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&amp;gt; show session info
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of sessions supported:                    65534
&lt;STRONG&gt;Number of active sessions:                       20&lt;/STRONG&gt;
Number of active TCP sessions:                   13
Number of active UDP sessions:                   7
Number of active ICMP sessions:                  0
Number of active BCAST sessions:                 0
Number of active MCAST sessions:                 0
Number of active predict sessions:               0
Session table utilization:                       0%
Number of sessions created since bootup:         1664505
&lt;STRONG&gt;Packet rate:                                     8/s&lt;/STRONG&gt;
Throughput:                                      4 kbps
New connection establish rate:                   0 cps
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 06:59:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-connections-count-of-asa-is-much-more-than-pa-s/m-p/67188#M39453</guid>
      <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-23T06:59:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

