<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Site-To-Site IPsec VPN tunnel same subnet both sides in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/site-to-site-ipsec-vpn-tunnel-same-subnet-both-sides/m-p/67222#M39472</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/938iA6EEB8C25864FDE9/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="Untitled.png" title="Untitled.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is this even possible, or am I crazy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:50:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zewwy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-10-23T16:50:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Site-To-Site IPsec VPN tunnel same subnet both sides</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/site-to-site-ipsec-vpn-tunnel-same-subnet-both-sides/m-p/67222#M39472</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/938iA6EEB8C25864FDE9/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="Untitled.png" title="Untitled.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is this even possible, or am I crazy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:50:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/site-to-site-ipsec-vpn-tunnel-same-subnet-both-sides/m-p/67222#M39472</guid>
      <dc:creator>Zewwy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-23T16:50:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Site-To-Site IPsec VPN tunnel same subnet both sides</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/site-to-site-ipsec-vpn-tunnel-same-subnet-both-sides/m-p/67227#M39473</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It is possible check the doc&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/twzvq79624/attachments/twzvq79624/documentation_tkb/83/1/Configuring%20route%20based%20IPSec%20with%20overlapping%20networks.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/twzvq79624/attachments/twzvq79624/documentation_tkb/83/1/Configuring%20route%20based%20IPSec%20with%20overlapping%20networks.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 19:39:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/site-to-site-ipsec-vpn-tunnel-same-subnet-both-sides/m-p/67227#M39473</guid>
      <dc:creator>pankaku</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-23T19:39:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Site-To-Site IPsec VPN tunnel same subnet both sides</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/site-to-site-ipsec-vpn-tunnel-same-subnet-both-sides/m-p/67278#M39487</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the response!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I wasn't sure if it was goign to be possible, but thats pretty awesome using NAT over IPsec with OSPF.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;One question as the documentation isn't fully clear on. Do I have to have a tunnel subnet equal to the network I need to tranverse the tunnel? in this case /24 or can I still have just a point to point subnet /30 for my tunnel?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2015 15:52:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/site-to-site-ipsec-vpn-tunnel-same-subnet-both-sides/m-p/67278#M39487</guid>
      <dc:creator>Zewwy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-26T15:52:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

