<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Static Route ECMP Monitoring upstream in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/static-route-ecmp-monitoring-upstream/m-p/69259#M40236</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Probably a quick question. I am attempting to implement ECMP with two static routes. Such as:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ECMP on&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;e1/1 = 192.168.255.9/29&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.255.11&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.255.12&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My question is, if 192.168.255.11 is unavailble, will the PAN remove&amp;nbsp;that route&amp;nbsp;as a vaiable route? Or do I have to use a dynamic routing protocol like ospf to protect against traffic being routed to a router that doesn't exist.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 14:48:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JimAraujo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-12-09T14:48:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Static Route ECMP Monitoring upstream</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/static-route-ecmp-monitoring-upstream/m-p/69259#M40236</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Probably a quick question. I am attempting to implement ECMP with two static routes. Such as:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ECMP on&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;e1/1 = 192.168.255.9/29&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.255.11&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.255.12&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My question is, if 192.168.255.11 is unavailble, will the PAN remove&amp;nbsp;that route&amp;nbsp;as a vaiable route? Or do I have to use a dynamic routing protocol like ospf to protect against traffic being routed to a router that doesn't exist.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 14:48:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/static-route-ecmp-monitoring-upstream/m-p/69259#M40236</guid>
      <dc:creator>JimAraujo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-09T14:48:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static Route ECMP Monitoring upstream</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/static-route-ecmp-monitoring-upstream/m-p/69262#M40238</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;ECMP&amp;nbsp;Dynamically shift traffic to another ECMP member to the same destination if a link fails, rather than having&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;to wait for the routing protocol or RIB table to elect an alternative path/route.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 15:45:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/static-route-ecmp-monitoring-upstream/m-p/69262#M40238</guid>
      <dc:creator>pankaku</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-09T15:45:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static Route ECMP Monitoring upstream</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/static-route-ecmp-monitoring-upstream/m-p/69264#M40240</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Both next-hop destinations&amp;nbsp;share the same VLAN, so does PAN rely solely&amp;nbsp;on the PAN's interface link state(e1/2 UP/DOWN) or does it check each next-hop via a ICMP ping or something?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 15:50:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/static-route-ecmp-monitoring-upstream/m-p/69264#M40240</guid>
      <dc:creator>JimAraujo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-09T15:50:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static Route ECMP Monitoring upstream</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/static-route-ecmp-monitoring-upstream/m-p/69427#M40295</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You have to use dynamic routing protocol, there is no ping check with ECMP yet in 7.0.X.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;With ECMP, the route will be withdaw only if the interface state goes down.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Correct me if I'm wrong.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 09:37:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/static-route-ecmp-monitoring-upstream/m-p/69427#M40295</guid>
      <dc:creator>PAN-3020-1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-14T09:37:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

