<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: HA Preemption and Session Syncronization - you need HA2 in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-preemption-and-session-syncronization-you-need-ha2/m-p/71758#M40917</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This may be a useful reference article for all things that are synched over each HA interface:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A title="High Availability Synchronization " href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Documentation-Articles/High-Availability-Synchronization/ta-p/61190" target="_blank"&gt;High Availability Synchronization&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;preempt does require a fully synced session table as it is designed to gracefully reset&amp;nbsp;to the desired active member after it has been unavailable, the absense of a synced session table would cause a majopr network disruption as all active sessions would be disrupted&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:21:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-01-28T09:21:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HA Preemption and Session Syncronization - you need HA2</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-preemption-and-session-syncronization-you-need-ha2/m-p/71729#M40906</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For whatever reason I didn't see the need to configure HA2. But while testing HA I could not get preemption to work. I read everything I could find online and got frustrated that it would not let the designated firewall take back control automatically. I read the system log and bit more closely and found this entry:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="line-height: 20px;"&gt;"HA Group 1: Ignoring session synchronization due to HA2-unavailable; preemption waiting for session synchronization"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I cannot find single reference online to a connection between session sync and preemption but there you have it. Just thought I would save the next bozo like some face palming by posting this. Good luck!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 21:15:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-preemption-and-session-syncronization-you-need-ha2/m-p/71729#M40906</guid>
      <dc:creator>DTG123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-27T21:15:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA Preemption and Session Syncronization - you need HA2</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-preemption-and-session-syncronization-you-need-ha2/m-p/71758#M40917</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This may be a useful reference article for all things that are synched over each HA interface:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A title="High Availability Synchronization " href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Documentation-Articles/High-Availability-Synchronization/ta-p/61190" target="_blank"&gt;High Availability Synchronization&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;preempt does require a fully synced session table as it is designed to gracefully reset&amp;nbsp;to the desired active member after it has been unavailable, the absense of a synced session table would cause a majopr network disruption as all active sessions would be disrupted&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:21:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-preemption-and-session-syncronization-you-need-ha2/m-p/71758#M40917</guid>
      <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-28T09:21:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA Preemption and Session Syncronization - you need HA2</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-preemption-and-session-syncronization-you-need-ha2/m-p/71760#M40919</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;No HA2 mean no session synchro then all running session wil be dropped in case of HA. It's ... less transparent for user &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;No HA if you don't have HA2 ... strange. What are you failover condition ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rgds&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;V.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:58:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-preemption-and-session-syncronization-you-need-ha2/m-p/71760#M40919</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceM</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-28T09:58:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

