<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: TSM backup and app override in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/tsm-backup-and-app-override/m-p/72941#M41242</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; You will still need a security policy as that will be looked up for allowing or denying any kind of traffic&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; As far as security is a concern app over ride will only exclude the layer 7 check and if you say that it's a trusted traffic then you can proceed with the solution&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;Traffic matching an application override policy forces the firewall&amp;nbsp;to handle the session as a regular stateful inspection firewall at Layer-4&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:18:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>vkalal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-02-16T22:18:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>TSM backup and app override</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/tsm-backup-and-app-override/m-p/72935#M41237</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is configuring app overide for backup traffic like TSM best practices?&amp;nbsp; TSM is always our biggest talker on all our firewalls and we know this traffic.&amp;nbsp; It seems to me we wouldn't want the fw to inspect it all the way through layer 7.&amp;nbsp; Please provide some feed back and if you agree, an config example would be greate.&amp;nbsp; We have a few TSM servers and the rest of the server environment backs up to TSM.&amp;nbsp; Multiple sources to a few destinations.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ted&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:33:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/tsm-backup-and-app-override/m-p/72935#M41237</guid>
      <dc:creator>treese</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-16T21:33:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TSM backup and app override</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/tsm-backup-and-app-override/m-p/72938#M41240</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; Create an application override policy and mention the following applications in it :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. service-now&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. tivoli-storage-manager&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This will exclude TSM from the layer 7 checks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:54:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/tsm-backup-and-app-override/m-p/72938#M41240</guid>
      <dc:creator>vkalal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-16T21:54:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TSM backup and app override</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/tsm-backup-and-app-override/m-p/72940#M41241</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sounds easy enough, once the app override policy is in place I shouldn't need a new security rule too?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you or have you delt with the same issue with exluding TSM or backup traffic?&amp;nbsp; I'm trying to understand what I'm loosing from a security perspective as opposed to cpu cycles and hardware.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:03:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/tsm-backup-and-app-override/m-p/72940#M41241</guid>
      <dc:creator>treese</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-16T22:03:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TSM backup and app override</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/tsm-backup-and-app-override/m-p/72941#M41242</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; You will still need a security policy as that will be looked up for allowing or denying any kind of traffic&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; As far as security is a concern app over ride will only exclude the layer 7 check and if you say that it's a trusted traffic then you can proceed with the solution&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;Traffic matching an application override policy forces the firewall&amp;nbsp;to handle the session as a regular stateful inspection firewall at Layer-4&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:18:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/tsm-backup-and-app-override/m-p/72941#M41242</guid>
      <dc:creator>vkalal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-16T22:18:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TSM backup and app override</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/tsm-backup-and-app-override/m-p/72943#M41244</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I currently have rules to allow this traffic, I justed didn't know if I needed a new one or needed to alter my rules with the new app overide set up.&amp;nbsp; Thanks again from your help.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:48:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/tsm-backup-and-app-override/m-p/72943#M41244</guid>
      <dc:creator>treese</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-16T22:48:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

