<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Global protect question in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-question/m-p/76153#M42189</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much for response. I actaully testing last night for internal only adn it worked great w/o NAT. Thanks for answering my question&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 13:51:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>clyde.franklin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-04-11T13:51:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Global protect question</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-question/m-p/76131#M42178</link>
      <description>I've seen multiple videos on global protect and need clarification. My first question is do you need to configure a static route on virtual router? Second quezon is to you need to configure NAT? Tutorial I've seen sometimes so these configurations some don't.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:08:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-question/m-p/76131#M42178</guid>
      <dc:creator>clyde.franklin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-10T16:08:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Global protect question</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-question/m-p/76139#M42182</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Clyde&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Purely technically your device does not need to be configured with a default route nor NAT&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If your device is set up with appropriate subnet routes or PolicyBasedForwarding to make sure traffic is returned to the appropriate segment, a default gateway can be left blank, although this would be an uncommon setup (most deployments will have a default gateway at least as a form of fallback)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If your GP connections will only be allowed access to internal resources (local web-access vs through the gateway), NAT is also not necessary&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;if you could add some details about the deployment you might be considering, we can provide more feedback&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 09:12:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-question/m-p/76139#M42182</guid>
      <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-11T09:12:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Global protect question</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-question/m-p/76153#M42189</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much for response. I actaully testing last night for internal only adn it worked great w/o NAT. Thanks for answering my question&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 13:51:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-question/m-p/76153#M42189</guid>
      <dc:creator>clyde.franklin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-11T13:51:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

