<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Requiring &amp;quot;Continue&amp;quot; to download PE executables? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/requiring-quot-continue-quot-to-download-pe-executables/m-p/77813#M42717</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;google Chrome updates should be classified as "google-update" if I remember correctly.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 14:17:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>googol</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-05-10T14:17:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Requiring "Continue" to download PE executables?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/requiring-quot-continue-quot-to-download-pe-executables/m-p/77811#M42716</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;How have people done this in practise?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We would like to prompt people so they have to choose "continue" to download PE executable files.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I know this only applies to "web-browsing" but when I test this, a Google Chrome update shows as "web-browsing" and isn't interactive so the user doesn't get the prompt to continue, nor does the update download.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Seems a very nice feature in practise but curious how people have tuned it not to cause problems.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 14:01:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/requiring-quot-continue-quot-to-download-pe-executables/m-p/77811#M42716</guid>
      <dc:creator>networkadmin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-10T14:01:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Requiring "Continue" to download PE executables?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/requiring-quot-continue-quot-to-download-pe-executables/m-p/77813#M42717</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;google Chrome updates should be classified as "google-update" if I remember correctly.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 14:17:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/requiring-quot-continue-quot-to-download-pe-executables/m-p/77813#M42717</guid>
      <dc:creator>googol</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-10T14:17:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Requiring "Continue" to download PE executables?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/requiring-quot-continue-quot-to-download-pe-executables/m-p/77817#M42719</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, but weird but in the logs there are several data filtering entries for the .exe that show "web-browsing" as the application, then it shows "google-update" and has downloaded.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;All are on port 80 which is still a little unusual.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 14:33:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/requiring-quot-continue-quot-to-download-pe-executables/m-p/77817#M42719</guid>
      <dc:creator>networkadmin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-10T14:33:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

