<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ECMP and circuit load in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-and-circuit-load/m-p/86088#M43406</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the responce. I'm going to submit a feature request.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:37:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ldavie</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-14T16:37:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ECMP and circuit load</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-and-circuit-load/m-p/85017#M43364</link>
      <description>&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: &amp;quot;Helvetica&amp;quot;,sans-serif; font-size: 10.5pt;"&gt;I have not been able to find an answer to this in the searching I have done. Does ECMP take into account the current load on the paths before choosing a path? We are using 'balanced round robin' on our metro-e links between locations, we have two providers with identical bandwidth at each location. My question is this: lets say&amp;nbsp;a backup session starts from location A to B, and it is placed on path "2", and that session uses 80% of the bandwidth. Path "1" is only at 10% utilization, and the next session is placed on path "1" because of round robin. Now the 3rd session starts and is placed on path "2" again, and let say that&amp;nbsp;utilization is now at 99% on path 2 and path one is at 20%. Will path 2 continue to take every other session or does the algorithm realize that path "1" is underutilized and favor that path?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:06:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-and-circuit-load/m-p/85017#M43364</guid>
      <dc:creator>ldavie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-13T19:06:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ECMP and circuit load</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-and-circuit-load/m-p/85053#M43366</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi...Load sharing of ECMP on the Palo Alto currently does not take into account real-time bandwidth use. &amp;nbsp; Using 'balanced round robin' will distribute equal session between ECMP paths and path 2 will continue to take every other session. &amp;nbsp;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:27:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-and-circuit-load/m-p/85053#M43366</guid>
      <dc:creator>rmonvon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-13T19:27:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ECMP and circuit load</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-and-circuit-load/m-p/86088#M43406</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the responce. I'm going to submit a feature request.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:37:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-and-circuit-load/m-p/86088#M43406</guid>
      <dc:creator>ldavie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-14T16:37:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

