<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Palo Alto PA-3050 100 per cent CPU in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/87891#M43471</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Out of curiosity; is there any way to be notified about issues such as this as soon as it happens? Palo Alto doesn't seem to do a very good job of notifying owners about potential issues, as this is the first time I've seen any mention of major issues with 7.1.2 with the 3k series.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 14:56:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-16T14:56:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Palo Alto PA-3050 100 % CPU</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/87778#M43463</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;These were upgraded from 7.0.6 to 7.1.2 on 31 May. &amp;nbsp;Since then we are suffering from the data plane very frequently using 100% CPU.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For example:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;admin@PA-3050-5(active)&amp;gt; show running resource-monitor hour&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Resource monitoring sampling data (per hour):&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;CPU load (%) during last 24 hours:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;core&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 5&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; avg max avg max avg max avg max avg max avg max&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7&amp;nbsp; 35&amp;nbsp; 16 100&amp;nbsp; 17 100&amp;nbsp; 19 100&amp;nbsp; 20 100&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 5&amp;nbsp; 45&amp;nbsp; 10&amp;nbsp; 73&amp;nbsp; 11&amp;nbsp; 74&amp;nbsp; 13&amp;nbsp; 75&amp;nbsp; 13&amp;nbsp; 75&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4&amp;nbsp; 15&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8&amp;nbsp; 60&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8&amp;nbsp; 60&amp;nbsp; 10&amp;nbsp; 61&amp;nbsp; 10&amp;nbsp; 60&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 6&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7&amp;nbsp; 12&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8&amp;nbsp; 13&amp;nbsp; 10&amp;nbsp; 15&amp;nbsp; 10&amp;nbsp; 16&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 6&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7&amp;nbsp; 19&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8&amp;nbsp; 19&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 9&amp;nbsp; 22&amp;nbsp; 10&amp;nbsp; 22&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 6&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7&amp;nbsp; 15&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8&amp;nbsp; 15&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 9&amp;nbsp; 19&amp;nbsp; 10&amp;nbsp; 19&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7&amp;nbsp; 13&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8&amp;nbsp; 14&amp;nbsp; 10&amp;nbsp; 16&amp;nbsp; 10&amp;nbsp; 17&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8&amp;nbsp; 14&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8&amp;nbsp; 15&amp;nbsp; 10&amp;nbsp; 17&amp;nbsp; 11&amp;nbsp; 18&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp; 24&amp;nbsp; 89&amp;nbsp; 45 100&amp;nbsp; 46 100&amp;nbsp; 48 100&amp;nbsp; 48 100&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp; 42&amp;nbsp; 81&amp;nbsp; 81 100&amp;nbsp; 81 100&amp;nbsp; 82 100&amp;nbsp; 82 100&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp; 41&amp;nbsp; 85&amp;nbsp; 85 100&amp;nbsp; 85 100&amp;nbsp; 86 100&amp;nbsp; 86 100&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp; 27&amp;nbsp; 60&amp;nbsp; 69 100&amp;nbsp; 70 100&amp;nbsp; 71 100&amp;nbsp; 72 100&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp; 35&amp;nbsp; 79&amp;nbsp; 77 100&amp;nbsp; 77 100&amp;nbsp; 78 100&amp;nbsp; 78 100&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp; 24&amp;nbsp; 77&amp;nbsp; 51 100&amp;nbsp; 52 100&amp;nbsp; 54 100&amp;nbsp; 55 100&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp; 28&amp;nbsp; 79&amp;nbsp; 59 100&amp;nbsp; 59 100&amp;nbsp; 61 100&amp;nbsp; 62 100&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp; 30&amp;nbsp; 83&amp;nbsp; 65 100&amp;nbsp; 66 100&amp;nbsp; 68 100&amp;nbsp; 68 100&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp; 29&amp;nbsp; 96&amp;nbsp; 63 100&amp;nbsp; 63 100&amp;nbsp; 65 100&amp;nbsp; 65 100&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp; 32&amp;nbsp; 91&amp;nbsp; 64 100&amp;nbsp; 65 100&amp;nbsp; 66 100&amp;nbsp; 66 100&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp; 14&amp;nbsp; 45&amp;nbsp; 35 100&amp;nbsp; 36 100&amp;nbsp; 39 100&amp;nbsp; 40 100&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp; 21&amp;nbsp; 90&amp;nbsp; 48 100&amp;nbsp; 49 100&amp;nbsp; 51 100&amp;nbsp; 52 100&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp; 13&amp;nbsp; 43&amp;nbsp; 31 100&amp;nbsp; 32 100&amp;nbsp; 35 100&amp;nbsp; 36 100&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp; 10&amp;nbsp; 44&amp;nbsp; 24 100&amp;nbsp; 25 100&amp;nbsp; 28 100&amp;nbsp; 29 100&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp; 11&amp;nbsp; 42&amp;nbsp; 26 100&amp;nbsp; 27 100&amp;nbsp; 30 100&amp;nbsp; 31 100&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; *&amp;nbsp; 16&amp;nbsp; 74&amp;nbsp; 36 100&amp;nbsp; 37 100&amp;nbsp; 40 100&amp;nbsp; 41 100&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We turned on the logging option to show dataplane under severe load and it is logging it many times an hour.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 15:00:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/87778#M43463</guid>
      <dc:creator>Transporter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-18T15:00:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo Alto PA-3050 100 per cent CPU</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/87830#M43464</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There is a current known issue with the 3k series on 7.1.2. I would advise you downgrade and wait for 7.1.3 or raise a support case for this.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ben&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:06:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/87830#M43464</guid>
      <dc:creator>bmorris1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T13:06:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo Alto PA-3050 100 per cent CPU</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/87838#M43465</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Ben,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for coming back to me. Do you know if this issue listed somewhere in Palo Alto documents? Checking 7.1.2 release notes and cannot find anything.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:18:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/87838#M43465</guid>
      <dc:creator>Transporter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T13:18:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo Alto PA-3050 100 per cent CPU</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/87856#M43467</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't think there is any documents about this at the moment. Your best bet is a&amp;nbsp;support case as they can give you more info about it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ben&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:34:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/87856#M43467</guid>
      <dc:creator>bmorris1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T13:34:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo Alto PA-3050 100 per cent CPU</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/87891#M43471</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Out of curiosity; is there any way to be notified about issues such as this as soon as it happens? Palo Alto doesn't seem to do a very good job of notifying owners about potential issues, as this is the first time I've seen any mention of major issues with 7.1.2 with the 3k series.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 14:56:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/87891#M43471</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T14:56:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo Alto PA-3050 100 per cent CPU</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/88538#M43496</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is tracked under bug 94790 and should be fixed in version 7.1.3 which is expected to be released on the first week of July.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:42:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/88538#M43496</guid>
      <dc:creator>jlavender</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-17T11:42:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo Alto PA-3050 100 per cent CPU</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/89068#M43522</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi BPry,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A do agree with you here. Especially when it is quite a big issue, that's&amp;nbsp;affecting system/operation a lot.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But no documents or notifications &amp;nbsp;I am afraid.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 14:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/89068#M43522</guid>
      <dc:creator>TranceforLife</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-18T14:58:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo Alto PA-3050 100 per cent CPU</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/89228#M43527</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have had some success to ask our sales engineer to check if there are any reported P1, P2 issues on a specific release. &amp;nbsp;If you have paid for TAM service, &amp;nbsp;TAM should be proactively updating their clients as well. &amp;nbsp; Also, &amp;nbsp;I will check to see if there are any hotfixes released after &amp;nbsp;2 to 4 weeks a new release available. &amp;nbsp;When you try to open a new case, on the software version drop down, you will see panos 7.0.1-H1, H2... &amp;nbsp;that tells me if a hotfix availble. &amp;nbsp; At that point, I will reach out to our sales engineer to ask for more information. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2016 13:44:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/89228#M43527</guid>
      <dc:creator>nextgenhappines</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-19T13:44:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo Alto PA-3050 100 per cent CPU</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/89236#M43529</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Would be nice to have a hot fix. Please let me know&amp;nbsp;if you get more info on this.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2016 16:20:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/89236#M43529</guid>
      <dc:creator>TranceforLife</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-19T16:20:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo Alto PA-3050 100 per cent CPU</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/92068#M43687</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'll have to check and see if we have TAM; I know that we have support and have access to a SE but I wasn't involved in the actual purchasing of it or ever informed really of anything to do with support other than the contact information for the SE.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:30:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/92068#M43687</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-24T14:30:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo Alto PA-3050 100 per cent CPU</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/92436#M43720</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/43480"&gt;@BPry﻿&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;you only have a TAM if you have preimum plus service support&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:20:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/92436#M43720</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brandon_Wertz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-27T12:20:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo Alto PA-3050 100 per cent CPU</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/92443#M43721</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;IMO Palo hasn't done a very good job with the stability of the entire 7.X.X train of code. &amp;nbsp;7.0.0 was completely deferred and 7.1.0 -.2 have been riddled with certificate/SSL issues among other things. &amp;nbsp;They could do a lot better,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All that being said if you're in the position to have the responsibility to own/manage the firewall service in your organization then it's your responsibility to ensure the code is right for your production enviornment. &amp;nbsp;Look at the new features being offered by the new code release then weigh that business requirement against potential risk of service impact if the upgrade doesn't go well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there a lot of bugs identified in the current 7.1.2 release, 11 pages of bug-IDs in-fact. &amp;nbsp;That in-it of itself stands out as a reason to not upgrade to it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sure we should hold Palo accountable for providing a code release that creates a service impact, but at the end of the day we're the ones accountable to our employers for the service outage if we deploy a prorduct with 11 pages of bugs.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:36:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/92443#M43721</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brandon_Wertz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-27T12:36:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo Alto PA-3050 100 per cent CPU</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/92468#M43722</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Let's try to be fair. &amp;nbsp;I would be mainly concern about the P1 and P2 bugs. &amp;nbsp; It is impossible to test all the config permutation. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; It will be great if PAN has an open bug databases to allow clients to search for reported identy bug and status update.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;E &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 13:59:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/92468#M43722</guid>
      <dc:creator>nextgenhappines</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-27T13:59:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo Alto PA-3050 100 per cent CPU</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/93574#M43888</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I second the desire for a searchable bug database. &amp;nbsp;This makes migrations and upgrades easier to select the right version of code for the particular configuration applied.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This can also let us find the right upgrade path to fix an obvious bug we hit on our own without needing to open a ticket and wait in the queues for support to search for the bug.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2016 11:04:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/93574#M43888</guid>
      <dc:creator>pulukas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-03T11:04:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo Alto PA-3050 100 per cent CPU</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/94003#M43904</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is this fixed for &amp;nbsp;PA - 5050 as well ? &amp;nbsp;I see similar issues with PA - 5050 since it is upgraded to 7.1.1 in May 2016.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 01:23:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/94003#M43904</guid>
      <dc:creator>Srivastava</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-05T01:23:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo Alto PA-3050 100 per cent CPU</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/94098#M43905</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't&amp;nbsp;know if this is affecting a PA-5k series. I didn't see anybody here reported but what l can confirm that even after installing from 7.1.1 &amp;gt; 7.1.3 on the PA-3050 we still experienced same symptoms of high&amp;nbsp;data plane CPU spikes as on . In the end,&amp;nbsp;TAC found out a lot of "unknown-UDP" sessions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; show session all filter application unknown-udp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Eliminating these seems to fixed the issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 07:06:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-pa-3050-100-cpu/m-p/94098#M43905</guid>
      <dc:creator>TranceforLife</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-05T07:06:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

