<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Content Update 592 False Positive in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/content-update-592-false-positive/m-p/94356#M43911</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I've noticed that since the 592 content update I've been recieving a large amount of Microsoft SMB Client Response Parsing Vulnerability alerts from Threat-ID 35427. I've checked the servers and the workstations and everything is up-to-date or not running an operating system that would have even included this particular CVE (2010-0476).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Particularly I only see this coming from our ASA zone that manages our remote users coming into the internal file servers, although this is the only such traffic that would go through the PA. I'm just wondering if anybody has noticed this or heard if it is going to be updated with the next content update; as when the issue first popped up it actually grounded our remote operations as the workers couldn't access there files since the default action is reset-both.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 18:06:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-07-05T18:06:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Content Update 592 False Positive</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/content-update-592-false-positive/m-p/94356#M43911</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've noticed that since the 592 content update I've been recieving a large amount of Microsoft SMB Client Response Parsing Vulnerability alerts from Threat-ID 35427. I've checked the servers and the workstations and everything is up-to-date or not running an operating system that would have even included this particular CVE (2010-0476).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Particularly I only see this coming from our ASA zone that manages our remote users coming into the internal file servers, although this is the only such traffic that would go through the PA. I'm just wondering if anybody has noticed this or heard if it is going to be updated with the next content update; as when the issue first popped up it actually grounded our remote operations as the workers couldn't access there files since the default action is reset-both.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 18:06:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/content-update-592-false-positive/m-p/94356#M43911</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-05T18:06:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Content Update 592 False Positive</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/content-update-592-false-positive/m-p/94885#M43953</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In case no one else responds to you about this. please be sure to report this as a false positive.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please see this document describing how to do this:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Threat-Articles/How-to-submit-a-vulnerability-signature-false-positive/ta-p/74602" target="_self"&gt;How to submit a vulnerability signature false positive&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 19:24:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/content-update-592-false-positive/m-p/94885#M43953</guid>
      <dc:creator>jdelio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-06T19:24:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

