<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Aggregate two physical ports and share amongst multiple VSYS? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-two-physical-ports-and-share-amongst-multiple-vsys/m-p/94930#M43955</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The parent aggregate ethernet "AE" group needs to be in one vsys. &amp;nbsp;You could either:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; 1.) don't assign it to a virtual router and/or security zone, and don't give it an ip address... (like picture attached), or&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; 2.) assign it to a "dummy" vsys&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="Capture.PNG" style="width: 800px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/4694iB7DC03127F66D1D2/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Capture.PNG" alt="Capture.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;﻿&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 20:05:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jvalentine</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-07-06T20:05:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Aggregate two physical ports and share amongst multiple VSYS?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-two-physical-ports-and-share-amongst-multiple-vsys/m-p/90649#M43585</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have an old fashioned flat network layout.&amp;nbsp; We are looking at a significant network redesign and part of that is doing a proper security architecture and separating our servers from our userbase and separating server tiers (e.g. web, application, database) from each other.&amp;nbsp; We also are a government that has several different verticals (e.g. health, public safety, public works, education) and we plan to design the network with these verticals being quasi-separate from each other.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In order to accomplish this, we are looking at acquiring a couple PA-5060 devices to put into an active/passive HA pair and then creating multiple VSYS inside the 5060, one for each service vertical (plus a general one).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our network architect had a question regarding the capability of the PA-5060 with regards to port aggregation, VSYS, and physical port sharing between VSYS.&amp;nbsp; Ideally, he would like to aggregate two of the 10 Gb SFP+ ports and have each VSYS be able to use these physical ports.&amp;nbsp; It's okay if the the method involves the creation of subinterfaces under the aggregate with individual, unique VLAN tags.&amp;nbsp; For example a logical interface representing two aggregated physical interfaces with 15 subinterfaces, where 5 subinterfaces are assigned to VSYS #1, another 5 subinterfaces assigned to VSYS #2, and the last 5 assigned to VSYS #3 (for example).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this something that is possible?&amp;nbsp; It seems like it must be, as the PA-5060 supports up to 225 VSYS.&amp;nbsp; That would be impossible without some method of sharing physical ports between the VSYS as the 5060 only has 24 physical ports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 21:00:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-two-physical-ports-and-share-amongst-multiple-vsys/m-p/90649#M43585</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottsander</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-21T21:00:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Aggregate two physical ports and share amongst multiple VSYS?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-two-physical-ports-and-share-amongst-multiple-vsys/m-p/90670#M43589</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You can do what you are planning. &amp;nbsp;The sub interfaces will get assigned to your vsys or virtual routers and you can share the physical port in the way you propose.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:21:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-two-physical-ports-and-share-amongst-multiple-vsys/m-p/90670#M43589</guid>
      <dc:creator>pulukas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-21T22:21:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Aggregate two physical ports and share amongst multiple VSYS?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-two-physical-ports-and-share-amongst-multiple-vsys/m-p/91030#M43622</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:38:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-two-physical-ports-and-share-amongst-multiple-vsys/m-p/91030#M43622</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottsander</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-22T13:38:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Aggregate two physical ports and share amongst multiple VSYS?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-two-physical-ports-and-share-amongst-multiple-vsys/m-p/94856#M43950</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can you please explain how is it possible? I would like to do the same thing. The physical interface can be associated with one vsys only. Also i cannot remove the vsys association from the interface.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 18:44:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-two-physical-ports-and-share-amongst-multiple-vsys/m-p/94856#M43950</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sly_Cooper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-06T18:44:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Aggregate two physical ports and share amongst multiple VSYS?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-two-physical-ports-and-share-amongst-multiple-vsys/m-p/94930#M43955</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The parent aggregate ethernet "AE" group needs to be in one vsys. &amp;nbsp;You could either:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; 1.) don't assign it to a virtual router and/or security zone, and don't give it an ip address... (like picture attached), or&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; 2.) assign it to a "dummy" vsys&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="Capture.PNG" style="width: 800px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/4694iB7DC03127F66D1D2/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Capture.PNG" alt="Capture.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;﻿&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 20:05:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-two-physical-ports-and-share-amongst-multiple-vsys/m-p/94930#M43955</guid>
      <dc:creator>jvalentine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-06T20:05:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

