<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Updates to firewalls from Panorama show failed, but seem to install properly in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/updates-to-firewalls-from-panorama-show-failed-but-seem-to/m-p/96105#M43997</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I do not have Panorama; but do I manage a PA-200 and a PA-500, both of which get their updates directly from Palo Alto's servers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The PA-200 routinely produces the above described symptom: when I do a manual Applications and Threats update (for example, in response to an 'Emergency Palo Alto Networks Content Updated' email). I receive a 'Content update job failed...' email, but I cannot see any sign of the update having done anything other than succeeded (either in the web interface or in the CLI).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This has never happened on the PA-500.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The PA-200 is running PAN-OS version 7 and the PA-500 is running version 6.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also possibly related: the PA-200 also sends emails from time to time, with subject 'SYSTEM ALERT : critical : Disk usage for / exceeds limit, 95 percent in use, cleaning filesystem'.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I don't know whether I am meant to make any manual intervention in response: I have not done anything to date, and the issue seems to take care of itself. If PAN-OS does do the necessary, then the 'critical' designation would seem to be unnecessarily alarmist?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2016 11:43:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>QuayleMunro</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-07-09T11:43:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Updates to firewalls from Panorama show failed, but seem to install properly</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/updates-to-firewalls-from-panorama-show-failed-but-seem-to/m-p/94838#M43946</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When I try to push updates to our firewalls from Panorama, it&amp;nbsp;reports that the job failed, but the jobs seem to complete anyway. &amp;nbsp;This happens when pushing dynamic updates, and I had it happen again to a software upgrade on a PA-200 last night. &amp;nbsp;When I installed the most recent Apps &amp;amp; Threat update, it showed failure on over 90% of our firewalls, but all of them seemed to succeed. &amp;nbsp;I've even observed an HA pair where one unit shows failed and the other didn't, but both received the update.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The process appears to complete the upload, and continue the installation, even though Panorama is reporting the job as failed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone else run across this problem or anything similar?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 18:05:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/updates-to-firewalls-from-panorama-show-failed-but-seem-to/m-p/94838#M43946</guid>
      <dc:creator>ajhoffman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-06T18:05:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Updates to firewalls from Panorama show failed, but seem to install properly</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/updates-to-firewalls-from-panorama-show-failed-but-seem-to/m-p/96105#M43997</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I do not have Panorama; but do I manage a PA-200 and a PA-500, both of which get their updates directly from Palo Alto's servers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The PA-200 routinely produces the above described symptom: when I do a manual Applications and Threats update (for example, in response to an 'Emergency Palo Alto Networks Content Updated' email). I receive a 'Content update job failed...' email, but I cannot see any sign of the update having done anything other than succeeded (either in the web interface or in the CLI).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This has never happened on the PA-500.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The PA-200 is running PAN-OS version 7 and the PA-500 is running version 6.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also possibly related: the PA-200 also sends emails from time to time, with subject 'SYSTEM ALERT : critical : Disk usage for / exceeds limit, 95 percent in use, cleaning filesystem'.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I don't know whether I am meant to make any manual intervention in response: I have not done anything to date, and the issue seems to take care of itself. If PAN-OS does do the necessary, then the 'critical' designation would seem to be unnecessarily alarmist?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2016 11:43:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/updates-to-firewalls-from-panorama-show-failed-but-seem-to/m-p/96105#M43997</guid>
      <dc:creator>QuayleMunro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-09T11:43:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

