<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: security policy order not working. in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-policy-order-not-working/m-p/107328#M44877</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Is this a web applicaion and do you use SSL decyrption? If you are not using SSL decyption and are attempting to block two app-ids it's pretty common for this to not actually work.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 15:27:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-08-25T15:27:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>security policy order not working.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-policy-order-not-working/m-p/106984#M44854</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a policy from trust to untrust any any allowed. I have cloned this policy and put on top of this with &amp;nbsp;address -test and deny 2 applications. This address is an ip for eg. 192.168.1.26 which is reserved in dhcp. But I can see apps being access via any any policy. Should the address be blocked using block policy.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 03:53:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-policy-order-not-working/m-p/106984#M44854</guid>
      <dc:creator>inderjit21</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-25T03:53:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: security policy order not working.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-policy-order-not-working/m-p/107023#M44856</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Most likely not all conditions were met in the 1st policy, so traffic passed through&amp;nbsp;the any any.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you check detailed logs from any any to see why it didn't&amp;nbsp;match 1st policy ( sorce&amp;nbsp;ip, destination , postrs,&amp;nbsp;)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Myky&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 06:18:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-policy-order-not-working/m-p/107023#M44856</guid>
      <dc:creator>TranceforLife</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-25T06:18:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: security policy order not working.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-policy-order-not-working/m-p/107328#M44877</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is this a web applicaion and do you use SSL decyrption? If you are not using SSL decyption and are attempting to block two app-ids it's pretty common for this to not actually work.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 15:27:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-policy-order-not-working/m-p/107328#M44877</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-25T15:27:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

