<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: HA peer split-brain recovery? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-peer-split-brain-recovery/m-p/107478#M44887</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/37163"&gt;@TranceforLife﻿&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sorry for any confusion..&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As far as which unit will become active after communication has been restored to both members.. the following applies:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. If you want to control which member becomes active first, you have to configure the Preemtive settings in &lt;STRONG&gt;Device &amp;gt; High Availability &amp;gt; General &amp;gt; Election Settings.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Note:&lt;/STRONG&gt; The member with the Lower number has Priority in the HA Pair.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="2016-08-25_ha1.png" style="width: 800px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5352i49C8DB63204951B9/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="2016-08-25_ha1.png" alt="2016-08-25_ha1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;﻿&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. If you do not configure this, then it would be whichever member is determined to be available first, which is basically a random thing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In general, if you would like to control this behavior, then that is why the Preemtive settings are there for.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:20:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jdelio</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-08-25T21:20:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HA peer split-brain recovery?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-peer-split-brain-recovery/m-p/107419#M44883</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;l came across this&amp;nbsp;nice article where Mivaldi explains&amp;nbsp;what is&amp;nbsp;peer split-brain&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/General-Topics/What-is-Peer-Split-Brain/m-p/19825#U19825" target="_blank"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/General-Topics/What-is-Peer-Split-Brain/m-p/19825#U19825&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a question.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We don't have HA1 backup link configured and our Heartbeat Backup (mgmt port) were &amp;nbsp;not reachable between to PAs. This is all to the switch issue between the devices. Passive node went to Active. So peer split-brain occurred. Just to confirm when HA1 heartbeat recovered ( say network connection is restored between the devices) will my "Active" node become back to "Passive". If you can clear this would be great. Logs below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2016-08-25 00:59:39.706 +0100 Error: ha_ping_peer_miss(src/ha_ping.c:756): Missed 1 ping timeouts out of 3 (ha1)&lt;BR /&gt;2016-08-25 00:59:39.706 +0100 Error: ha_ping_peer_miss(src/ha_ping.c:756): Missed 1 ping timeouts out of 3 (mgmt)&lt;BR /&gt;2016-08-25 00:59:40.706 +0100 Error: ha_ping_peer_miss(src/ha_ping.c:756): Missed 2 ping timeouts out of 3 (ha1)&lt;BR /&gt;2016-08-25 00:59:40.706 +0100 Error: ha_ping_peer_miss(src/ha_ping.c:756): Missed 2 ping timeouts out of 3 (mgmt)&lt;BR /&gt;2016-08-25 00:59:41.707 +0100 Error: ha_ping_peer_miss(src/ha_ping.c:756): Missed 3 ping timeouts out of 3 (ha1)&lt;BR /&gt;2016-08-25 00:59:41.707 +0100 Error: ha_ping_peer_miss(src/ha_ping.c:763): We have missed 4 pings from the peer for group 1 (ha1), restarting connection&lt;BR /&gt;2016-08-25 00:59:41.709 +0100 Warning: ha_event_log(src/ha_event.c:47): HA Group 1: HA1 connection down&lt;BR /&gt;2016-08-25 00:59:41.709 +0100 Warning: ha_event_log(src/ha_event.c:47): HA Group 1: All HA1 connections down&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Myky&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:57:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-peer-split-brain-recovery/m-p/107419#M44883</guid>
      <dc:creator>TranceforLife</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-25T16:57:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA peer split-brain recovery?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-peer-split-brain-recovery/m-p/107478#M44887</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/37163"&gt;@TranceforLife﻿&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sorry for any confusion..&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As far as which unit will become active after communication has been restored to both members.. the following applies:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. If you want to control which member becomes active first, you have to configure the Preemtive settings in &lt;STRONG&gt;Device &amp;gt; High Availability &amp;gt; General &amp;gt; Election Settings.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Note:&lt;/STRONG&gt; The member with the Lower number has Priority in the HA Pair.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="2016-08-25_ha1.png" style="width: 800px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5352i49C8DB63204951B9/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="2016-08-25_ha1.png" alt="2016-08-25_ha1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;﻿&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. If you do not configure this, then it would be whichever member is determined to be available first, which is basically a random thing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In general, if you would like to control this behavior, then that is why the Preemtive settings are there for.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:20:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-peer-split-brain-recovery/m-p/107478#M44887</guid>
      <dc:creator>jdelio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-25T21:20:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA peer split-brain recovery?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-peer-split-brain-recovery/m-p/107489#M44890</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Cool. Thx&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:40:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-peer-split-brain-recovery/m-p/107489#M44890</guid>
      <dc:creator>TranceforLife</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-25T21:40:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

