<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Priority in PAN-QoS in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/priority-in-pan-qos/m-p/118183#M45613</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Reaper,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks for you response.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In case of same class + same priority, what is the tie-braker choosed to priorize one of other?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The QoS Policies play some role on this decisions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 13:45:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ilnanu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-10-06T13:45:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Priority in PAN-QoS</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/priority-in-pan-qos/m-p/118039#M45605</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you are configuring QoS, it's possible to define more than one profile, and in this profile put 'til 8 Class defined.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you apply over the egress interface, it's possible to add this Class based over an source Subnet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is my question, what "priority use" or what is the behaviour if over the same interface applies in ex:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From Subnet 1.1.1.0/24 ---- Profile A - Class2 - Priority Real-Time&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;From Subnet 2.2.2.0/24 ---- Profile B - Class2 - Priority Real-Time&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;How are evaluated?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As far I understand, in order to enqueue, the order are: 1. Class, 2.Priority. What role takes QoS Policies here?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;thanks!!!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 07:13:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/priority-in-pan-qos/m-p/118039#M45605</guid>
      <dc:creator>nanukanu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-06T07:13:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Priority in PAN-QoS</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/priority-in-pan-qos/m-p/118088#M45608</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;you can assign different profiles to different subnets, but the sum of all profiles will need to comply with the total bandwidth available&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="2016-10-06_09-43-31.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/skins/images/5DE745A4213343D2E26844B0146B285E/responsive_peak/images/image_not_found.png" alt="2016-10-06_09-43-31.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;﻿&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;IO priority wise, both classes will share the same hardware pool, so if both classes are real-time, they will gain preference over other classes with lower priority, and will need to share their own priority (so it's possible they fight over it)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 07:46:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/priority-in-pan-qos/m-p/118088#M45608</guid>
      <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-06T07:46:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Priority in PAN-QoS</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/priority-in-pan-qos/m-p/118183#M45613</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Reaper,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks for you response.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In case of same class + same priority, what is the tie-braker choosed to priorize one of other?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The QoS Policies play some role on this decisions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 13:45:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/priority-in-pan-qos/m-p/118183#M45613</guid>
      <dc:creator>ilnanu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-06T13:45:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Priority in PAN-QoS</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/priority-in-pan-qos/m-p/118193#M45614</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;class doesn't really matter since you could set class 8 to real-time&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Real-time priority has it's own queue but if contention occurs for 2 sessions in the same priority, FIFO would apply&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;normally the lower priority sessions would get discarded in favor of the higher priority&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 13:59:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/priority-in-pan-qos/m-p/118193#M45614</guid>
      <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-06T13:59:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Priority in PAN-QoS</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/priority-in-pan-qos/m-p/118203#M45615</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Reaper,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But, if in the same profile Class1 has Normal and Class8 has Real-Time, isn't prioritaty Class1?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 15:18:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/priority-in-pan-qos/m-p/118203#M45615</guid>
      <dc:creator>ilnanu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-06T15:18:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Priority in PAN-QoS</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/priority-in-pan-qos/m-p/118269#M45617</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/43910"&gt;@ilnanu﻿&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;no, in your example class8 has priority because it has real-time (what's under the 'priority' column is what counts)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;the 'class' is more like a name (like A,B,C,...) ,rather than a designation of priority. it's just easier to categorize your priorities with a numbered class ( the default profile goes class1 realtime to class8 low, but you could easily switch that order around or mix it up, whatever makes more sense to you)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 21:25:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/priority-in-pan-qos/m-p/118269#M45617</guid>
      <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-06T21:25:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

