<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Naming convention for security policies and address objects/services in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/naming-convention-for-security-policies-and-address-objects/m-p/120626#M45957</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm currently using Allow/Deny-SourceZone-DestinationZone-Application e.g Allow-Inside-Outside-Skype.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sharief&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:05:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MohamedSharief</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-10-23T12:05:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Naming convention for security policies and address objects/services</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/naming-convention-for-security-policies-and-address-objects/m-p/120565#M45946</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Experts&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could anyone suggest the best way to name security policies as per their experience?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;GR&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2016 20:53:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/naming-convention-for-security-policies-and-address-objects/m-p/120565#M45946</guid>
      <dc:creator>ghostrider</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-22T20:53:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Naming convention for security policies and address objects/services</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/naming-convention-for-security-policies-and-address-objects/m-p/120626#M45957</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm currently using Allow/Deny-SourceZone-DestinationZone-Application e.g Allow-Inside-Outside-Skype.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sharief&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:05:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/naming-convention-for-security-policies-and-address-objects/m-p/120626#M45957</guid>
      <dc:creator>MohamedSharief</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-23T12:05:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Naming convention for security policies and address objects/services</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/naming-convention-for-security-policies-and-address-objects/m-p/120728#M45966</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for reply. But there are many policies like this from different source address and destination. How are you hanlding this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;GR&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:06:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/naming-convention-for-security-policies-and-address-objects/m-p/120728#M45966</guid>
      <dc:creator>ghostrider</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-24T10:06:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

