<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Win32.malicious.dhlx in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/win32-malicious-dhlx/m-p/123290#M46214</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Is anyone seeing this on their palo alot blocking some traffic?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 15:45:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jdprovine</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-11-02T15:45:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Win32.malicious.dhlx</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/win32-malicious-dhlx/m-p/123290#M46214</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is anyone seeing this on their palo alot blocking some traffic?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 15:45:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/win32-malicious-dhlx/m-p/123290#M46214</guid>
      <dc:creator>jdprovine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-02T15:45:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Win32.malicious.dhlx</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/win32-malicious-dhlx/m-p/123314#M46216</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I only saw it a few times for a JAR file. It's probably a false positive, since the name of the virus contains Win32 and it has nothing to do with a Java archive.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Benjamin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 16:06:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/win32-malicious-dhlx/m-p/123314#M46216</guid>
      <dc:creator>BenjAudy.MTL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-02T16:06:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Win32.malicious.dhlx</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/win32-malicious-dhlx/m-p/123317#M46217</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yeah thats what I thought too so I submitted it to PA to check and make sure its a false positive&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 16:11:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/win32-malicious-dhlx/m-p/123317#M46217</guid>
      <dc:creator>jdprovine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-02T16:11:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Win32.malicious.dhlx</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/win32-malicious-dhlx/m-p/123629#M46237</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We were seeing a large amount of false positives with the signature also. Opened up a support case, the problem has been fixed in the latest content update.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 13:29:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/win32-malicious-dhlx/m-p/123629#M46237</guid>
      <dc:creator>MangoTango</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-03T13:29:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Win32.malicious.dhlx</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/win32-malicious-dhlx/m-p/123847#M46252</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is the second or third time we have come across this issue in the last few months&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 21:09:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/win32-malicious-dhlx/m-p/123847#M46252</guid>
      <dc:creator>jdprovine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-03T21:09:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

