<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: why do we update wf-content-version on WF-500 appliance in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-do-we-update-wf-content-version-on-wf-500-appliance/m-p/133060#M47156</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope WF update is different than "wf-content-version" update.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I agree with you that WF &lt;SPAN&gt;updates contain signatures created by analyzing files from other locations (and other customers), but this update will be taken care by firewall who got the WildFire license.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;But my question is why do we update&amp;nbsp;"wf-content-version" on WF-500 appliance?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Fozail&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:15:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>fozail</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-12-15T14:15:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>why do we update wf-content-version on WF-500 appliance</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-do-we-update-wf-content-version-on-wf-500-appliance/m-p/132961#M47140</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was wondering that&amp;nbsp;why do we update wf-content-version on WF-500 appliance, what is the reason for it. As I have configured WF-500 to generate the signature locally, what additional value will be added by downloading&amp;nbsp;why do we update wf-content-version on WF-500 appliance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fozail&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 06:35:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-do-we-update-wf-content-version-on-wf-500-appliance/m-p/132961#M47140</guid>
      <dc:creator>fozail</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-15T06:35:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why do we update wf-content-version on WF-500 appliance</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-do-we-update-wf-content-version-on-wf-500-appliance/m-p/132969#M47141</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Fozail&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The WF updates contain signatures created by analyzing files from other locations (and other customers)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Someone else may have received an infected file before you and a signature created. This means you no longer need to dedicate CPU cycles to investigate a file if a verdict and signature is already available&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 08:08:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-do-we-update-wf-content-version-on-wf-500-appliance/m-p/132969#M47141</guid>
      <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-15T08:08:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why do we update wf-content-version on WF-500 appliance</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-do-we-update-wf-content-version-on-wf-500-appliance/m-p/133060#M47156</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope WF update is different than "wf-content-version" update.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I agree with you that WF &lt;SPAN&gt;updates contain signatures created by analyzing files from other locations (and other customers), but this update will be taken care by firewall who got the WildFire license.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;But my question is why do we update&amp;nbsp;"wf-content-version" on WF-500 appliance?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Fozail&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:15:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-do-we-update-wf-content-version-on-wf-500-appliance/m-p/133060#M47156</guid>
      <dc:creator>fozail</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-15T14:15:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why do we update wf-content-version on WF-500 appliance</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-do-we-update-wf-content-version-on-wf-500-appliance/m-p/133062#M47157</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="sss.PNG" style="width: 800px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/6932iA51D945069D5FC64/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="sss.PNG" alt="sss.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:30:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-do-we-update-wf-content-version-on-wf-500-appliance/m-p/133062#M47157</guid>
      <dc:creator>TranceforLife</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-15T14:30:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why do we update wf-content-version on WF-500 appliance</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-do-we-update-wf-content-version-on-wf-500-appliance/m-p/133067#M47158</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have seen this information in the admin guide, but it does not tell that WF-500 appliance will get a threat data base or hash database along with&amp;nbsp;wf-content-version, as WF-500 should perform two function primarily:-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) match the hash sent by the PA firewall, it it is in the database tell what is the verdict.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) If hash was not matched PA firewall should upload file and session information to WF-500 appliance, it should be run and analyzed here for the verdict/behaviour.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So where do we see the advanatge of updating&amp;nbsp;wf-content-version?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fozail&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:56:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-do-we-update-wf-content-version-on-wf-500-appliance/m-p/133067#M47158</guid>
      <dc:creator>fozail</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-15T14:56:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why do we update wf-content-version on WF-500 appliance</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-do-we-update-wf-content-version-on-wf-500-appliance/m-p/133072#M47160</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;well, 2. is pretty compelling &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1) things already scanned elsewhere do not need to be rescaned, verdict immediately available (in case the firewall is not aware yet)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2) scanning engine updates making your scanning engines better and results more accurate&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:07:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-do-we-update-wf-content-version-on-wf-500-appliance/m-p/133072#M47160</guid>
      <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-15T15:07:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why do we update wf-content-version on WF-500 appliance</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-do-we-update-wf-content-version-on-wf-500-appliance/m-p/133073#M47161</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's crystal clear now &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:16:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-do-we-update-wf-content-version-on-wf-500-appliance/m-p/133073#M47161</guid>
      <dc:creator>fozail</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-15T15:16:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

