https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dynamic-virtual-routers/m-p/135120#M47459 <P>Can interfaces be assigned to two different virtual routers so that for example if a particular static route stops working it will "dymanically failover" to the other virtual router which has another static route for the interface?</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Sorry I'm pretty dumb when it comes to routing.</P> Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:32:51 GMT mksherman 2016-12-30T00:32:51Z https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dynamic-virtual-routers/m-p/135120#M47459 <P>Can interfaces be assigned to two different virtual routers so that for example if a particular static route stops working it will "dymanically failover" to the other virtual router which has another static route for the interface?</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Sorry I'm pretty dumb when it comes to routing.</P> Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:32:51 GMT https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dynamic-virtual-routers/m-p/135120#M47459 mksherman 2016-12-30T00:32:51Z https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dynamic-virtual-routers/m-p/135148#M47467 <P>No, interface can not belong to 2 VRs. But you don't need mutliple VRs for simple route failover. Check&nbsp;policy-based forwarding (PBF) if it can help you with your scenario.</P> Fri, 30 Dec 2016 07:47:59 GMT https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dynamic-virtual-routers/m-p/135148#M47467 santonic 2016-12-30T07:47:59Z