<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Is Graceful shutdown a good idea to invoke Failover ? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-graceful-shutdown-a-good-idea-to-invoke-failover/m-p/136164#M47594</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Next to a project that I have to acheive in some days, i've been searching for a answer to my questions that I haven't found.&lt;BR /&gt;That why I try here now and I hope you will be able to assist me &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Due to a UPS maintenance, I will have to unplug our two Palo Alto from power. We have two Power Domain, so one PA is on a PD and the other one is on another PD.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would like to be the cleanest possible to provoke the failover from the Active PA (that I will have to unplug from power) to the other PA that will stay in service during this time. I've been thinking that making a Graceful shutdown of the Active PA before unplugging it from power can be a good idea.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question(s) :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Is the graceful shutdown a good idea ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Will the passive unit take the lead when I will make the graceful shutdown executed on the active ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In advance many thanks and feel free to tell me if i'm not clear.&lt;BR /&gt;Have a nice day !&lt;BR /&gt;Franck&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:36:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Francky3084</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-01-06T12:36:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is Graceful shutdown a good idea to invoke Failover ?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-graceful-shutdown-a-good-idea-to-invoke-failover/m-p/136164#M47594</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Next to a project that I have to acheive in some days, i've been searching for a answer to my questions that I haven't found.&lt;BR /&gt;That why I try here now and I hope you will be able to assist me &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Due to a UPS maintenance, I will have to unplug our two Palo Alto from power. We have two Power Domain, so one PA is on a PD and the other one is on another PD.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would like to be the cleanest possible to provoke the failover from the Active PA (that I will have to unplug from power) to the other PA that will stay in service during this time. I've been thinking that making a Graceful shutdown of the Active PA before unplugging it from power can be a good idea.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question(s) :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Is the graceful shutdown a good idea ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Will the passive unit take the lead when I will make the graceful shutdown executed on the active ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In advance many thanks and feel free to tell me if i'm not clear.&lt;BR /&gt;Have a nice day !&lt;BR /&gt;Franck&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:36:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-graceful-shutdown-a-good-idea-to-invoke-failover/m-p/136164#M47594</guid>
      <dc:creator>Francky3084</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-06T12:36:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is Graceful shutdown à good idea to invoke Failover ?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-graceful-shutdown-a-good-idea-to-invoke-failover/m-p/136175#M47595</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Franck&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A gracefull shutdown will certainly work, especially if you're going to need to power down anyway. Alternatively you can suspend the active device&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;admin@myNGFW&amp;gt; request high-availability state suspend &lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In both cases the passive unit will assume the active role (do a quick 'show session all' on the passive unit to ensure it is properly receiving session information from the active peer)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 11:47:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-graceful-shutdown-a-good-idea-to-invoke-failover/m-p/136175#M47595</guid>
      <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-06T11:47:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is Graceful shutdown à good idea to invoke Failover ?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-graceful-shutdown-a-good-idea-to-invoke-failover/m-p/136184#M47602</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Wow, that was quick, thanks you &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ok so now I feel more safe, also thanks you for your alternative.&lt;BR /&gt;A very last question&amp;nbsp;: Is there a best practice regarding my kind of operation ? (To have the smoothier experience possible and the less disruption time possible)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or what we talk is already sufficient ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks again for your quickness and good afternoon !&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:35:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-graceful-shutdown-a-good-idea-to-invoke-failover/m-p/136184#M47602</guid>
      <dc:creator>Francky3084</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-06T12:35:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is Graceful shutdown à good idea to invoke Failover ?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-graceful-shutdown-a-good-idea-to-invoke-failover/m-p/136193#M47603</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Franck&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I guess your situation leans closely to the PAN-OS upgrade process for which there is a best practices :&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Featured-Articles/Best-Practices-for-PAN-OS-Upgrade/ta-p/111045" target="_blank"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Featured-Articles/Best-Practices-for-PAN-OS-Upgrade/ta-p/111045&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;similar&amp;nbsp;steps, using the suspend method&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;what physically happens when the active device is suspended or shut down:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- the active should already have synced it's ctive sessions over to the passive device so it can continue processing existing sessions&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- the passive device brings its interfaces online&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- once interfaces are up, sends out a gratuitous ARP to inform all neighbours it is now in charge of the MAC addresses associated with your cluster&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- neighbours start sending all packets to passive device&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- passive device starts creating new sessions for all SYN packets received, continues processing packets for existing sessions&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:02:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-graceful-shutdown-a-good-idea-to-invoke-failover/m-p/136193#M47603</guid>
      <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-06T13:02:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is Graceful shutdown à good idea to invoke Failover ?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-graceful-shutdown-a-good-idea-to-invoke-failover/m-p/136196#M47605</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Perfect ! Thanks a lot again reaper !&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:24:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-graceful-shutdown-a-good-idea-to-invoke-failover/m-p/136196#M47605</guid>
      <dc:creator>Francky3084</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-06T13:24:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is Graceful shutdown à good idea to invoke Failover ?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-graceful-shutdown-a-good-idea-to-invoke-failover/m-p/136591#M47665</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you have GUI access and prefer to use it the same command via CLI is also in the GUI&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="HA_Command.JPG" style="width: 800px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/7204i6CD32CD77251BBE4/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="HA_Command.JPG" alt="HA_Command.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 20:52:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-graceful-shutdown-a-good-idea-to-invoke-failover/m-p/136591#M47665</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brandon_Wertz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-09T20:52:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

