<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Why would someone use &amp;quot;Next VR&amp;quot; for next hop? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-would-someone-use-quot-next-vr-quot-for-next-hop/m-p/136410#M47635</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It's useful for scenario with IPSEC redundancy on FW with mutliple ISPs. Set a VR for each ISP and one for local networks. And then use intra VR routing for traffic between them.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 07:05:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>santonic</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-01-09T07:05:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why would someone use "Next VR" for next hop?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-would-someone-use-quot-next-vr-quot-for-next-hop/m-p/136331#M47621</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When creating a static route on one virtual router. What would be an example of why you would choose "next vr"?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2017 00:10:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-would-someone-use-quot-next-vr-quot-for-next-hop/m-p/136331#M47621</guid>
      <dc:creator>mksherman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-07T00:10:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why would someone use "Next VR" for next hop?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-would-someone-use-quot-next-vr-quot-for-next-hop/m-p/136344#M47623</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Next-VR: to forward traffic to a destination that is not in the local VR but another VR Used often when dealing with Multiple VSYS scenario, where each VSYS has its own VR.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/twzvq79624/attachments/twzvq79624/ConfigurationArticles/1322/1/Understanding%20Virtual%20Router%20and%20Virtual%20Systems%20v1.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/twzvq79624/attachments/twzvq79624/ConfigurationArticles/1322/1/Understanding%20Virtual%20Router%20and%20Virtual%20Systems%20v1.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2017 06:42:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-would-someone-use-quot-next-vr-quot-for-next-hop/m-p/136344#M47623</guid>
      <dc:creator>TranceforLife</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-07T06:42:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why would someone use "Next VR" for next hop?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-would-someone-use-quot-next-vr-quot-for-next-hop/m-p/136351#M47624</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/37163"&gt;@TranceforLife&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;is right, it's only meant to be used in a multivsys enviroment. Once you have multiple VSYS there are plenty of reasons that you would want to route traffic to another VSYS.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you only utilize a single VSYS then you still might have it broken up so different buildings have their own VR; but usually if you were going that route then it's easier to just make the building it's own VSYS.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2017 14:48:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-would-someone-use-quot-next-vr-quot-for-next-hop/m-p/136351#M47624</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-07T14:48:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why would someone use "Next VR" for next hop?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-would-someone-use-quot-next-vr-quot-for-next-hop/m-p/136410#M47635</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's useful for scenario with IPSEC redundancy on FW with mutliple ISPs. Set a VR for each ISP and one for local networks. And then use intra VR routing for traffic between them.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 07:05:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/why-would-someone-use-quot-next-vr-quot-for-next-hop/m-p/136410#M47635</guid>
      <dc:creator>santonic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-09T07:05:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

