<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Removing interfaces off a VM-series HA pair in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/removing-interfaces-off-a-vm-series-ha-pair/m-p/139675#M48160</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;As per title, functionally, this is easy to do.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Shut VM down.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Remove interfaces from virt solution configuration for the VM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. Power up.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. All is well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But, in a PAN VM-series HA pair... I'm worried that I might have to shut both down AT THE SAME TIME.&amp;nbsp; To remove the interfaces symmetrically.. off both.&amp;nbsp; And then power both back up again. To maintain the control/HA status.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are the number of interfaces differing from Active to Passive going to hurt the HA control aspect and complain ? .. because i'd like to do this one member at a time thus not having any forwarding outage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Active first, while Passive is forwarding.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Passive next, while Active forwarding.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:16:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mpgioia</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-01-27T00:16:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Removing interfaces off a VM-series HA pair</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/removing-interfaces-off-a-vm-series-ha-pair/m-p/139675#M48160</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As per title, functionally, this is easy to do.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Shut VM down.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Remove interfaces from virt solution configuration for the VM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. Power up.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. All is well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But, in a PAN VM-series HA pair... I'm worried that I might have to shut both down AT THE SAME TIME.&amp;nbsp; To remove the interfaces symmetrically.. off both.&amp;nbsp; And then power both back up again. To maintain the control/HA status.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are the number of interfaces differing from Active to Passive going to hurt the HA control aspect and complain ? .. because i'd like to do this one member at a time thus not having any forwarding outage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Active first, while Passive is forwarding.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Passive next, while Active forwarding.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:16:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/removing-interfaces-off-a-vm-series-ha-pair/m-p/139675#M48160</guid>
      <dc:creator>mpgioia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-27T00:16:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Removing interfaces off a VM-series HA pair</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/removing-interfaces-off-a-vm-series-ha-pair/m-p/140639#M48299</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Friendly bump to move this to the top, cheekily, for pushing for people's input &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":face_with_tongue:"&gt;😛&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 06:21:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/removing-interfaces-off-a-vm-series-ha-pair/m-p/140639#M48299</guid>
      <dc:creator>mpgioia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-02T06:21:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

