<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Routing issue in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/routing-issue/m-p/144718#M48908</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are expecting a routing problem. Our Pa is learning router from eth1 from OSPF, so the VoIP traffic is going through this interface properly, on the another hand we have a VPN configured in another ISP just in case OSPF goes down. the problem is that OSPF is working fine and suddenly some connections (same source/destination) are going through VPN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10.0.0.0/8 10.3.200.14 220 A S tunnel.4 (VPN BACKUP TUNEL)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10.0.24.0/22 10.3.0.1 10 A O2 19554 ethernet1/1 (MPLS) (MAIN)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OSPF learn routes have more preference than static rotue to the tunnel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PA version is 7.1.4-h2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Captura1.JPG" style="width: 800px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/7900i5A8BF44C200087C5/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Captura1.JPG" alt="Captura1.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why PA is routing some connections to the tunnel??????&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:15:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Es_tecsupportsecurity</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-02-24T12:15:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Routing issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/routing-issue/m-p/144718#M48908</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are expecting a routing problem. Our Pa is learning router from eth1 from OSPF, so the VoIP traffic is going through this interface properly, on the another hand we have a VPN configured in another ISP just in case OSPF goes down. the problem is that OSPF is working fine and suddenly some connections (same source/destination) are going through VPN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10.0.0.0/8 10.3.200.14 220 A S tunnel.4 (VPN BACKUP TUNEL)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10.0.24.0/22 10.3.0.1 10 A O2 19554 ethernet1/1 (MPLS) (MAIN)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OSPF learn routes have more preference than static rotue to the tunnel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PA version is 7.1.4-h2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Captura1.JPG" style="width: 800px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/7900i5A8BF44C200087C5/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Captura1.JPG" alt="Captura1.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why PA is routing some connections to the tunnel??????&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:15:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/routing-issue/m-p/144718#M48908</guid>
      <dc:creator>Es_tecsupportsecurity</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-24T12:15:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Routing issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/routing-issue/m-p/144733#M48916</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/53726"&gt;@Es_tecsupportsecurity&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;the below article might help you a little bit.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Configuration-Articles/How-to-Influence-Routes-in-OSPF-to-Take-Precedence-Over-Static/ta-p/62590" target="_blank"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Configuration-Articles/How-to-Influence-Routes-in-OSPF-to-Take-Precedence-Over-Static/ta-p/62590&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:59:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/routing-issue/m-p/144733#M48916</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-24T12:59:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Routing issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/routing-issue/m-p/144734#M48917</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I checked this document. Static route has 220 of Administrative distance, so its higher than OSPF.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 13:02:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/routing-issue/m-p/144734#M48917</guid>
      <dc:creator>Es_tecsupportsecurity</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-24T13:02:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Routing issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/routing-issue/m-p/144759#M48928</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the route is more specific, it doesnt matter what the admin distance is, it will be preferred. I have setup connections similar to the one you have many times and use Policy Based Routing rules with a monitor to force traffic over the 'better' link and fail over automatically.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is an older doc but still holds true.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Configuration-Articles/Dual-ISP-Branch-Office-Configuration/ta-p/59346" target="_blank"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Configuration-Articles/Dual-ISP-Branch-Office-Configuration/ta-p/59346&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This one is a bit newer but the config does not require multiple VR's&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Configuration-Articles/How-to-Configure-a-Palo-Alto-Networks-Firewall-with-Dual-ISPs/ta-p/59774" target="_blank"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Configuration-Articles/How-to-Configure-a-Palo-Alto-Networks-Firewall-with-Dual-ISPs/ta-p/59774&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:42:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/routing-issue/m-p/144759#M48928</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-24T14:42:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Routing issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/routing-issue/m-p/144986#M48971</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes i know, route more specifi is over MPLS so this is OK. The behaviour is expected but suddenly traffic is going trough VPN with no reason.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 08:43:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/routing-issue/m-p/144986#M48971</guid>
      <dc:creator>Es_tecsupportsecurity</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-27T08:43:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

