<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: HA sessions synchronization initiated by or to the Active. in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-sessions-synchronization-initiated-by-or-to-the-active/m-p/148965#M49699</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The sessions are getting reestablished&amp;nbsp;automatically (at least can confirm with BGP and IPSec VPN). Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:31:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TranceforLife</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-22T16:31:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HA sessions synchronization initiated by or to the Active.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-sessions-synchronization-initiated-by-or-to-the-active/m-p/148926#M49688</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Got a random question&amp;nbsp;regarding the sessions synchronisation when running HA :0 If l understood correctly&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;only the sessions that are not initiated by the Active device will be synchronised to the Passive device. Does it mean that all OSPF, BGP and l believe VPN tunnels will be re-established? &amp;nbsp;So only traversing sessions are synchronised and not interrupted&amp;nbsp;during failover.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 23:40:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-sessions-synchronization-initiated-by-or-to-the-active/m-p/148926#M49688</guid>
      <dc:creator>TranceforLife</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-24T23:40:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA session synchronization initiated by or to the Active.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-sessions-synchronization-initiated-by-or-to-the-active/m-p/148938#M49691</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not positive on the answer but when I do an HA failover the VPN tunnel temporarly goes down and then will re-establish.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:07:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-sessions-synchronization-initiated-by-or-to-the-active/m-p/148938#M49691</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-22T16:07:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA session synchronization initiated by or to the Active.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-sessions-synchronization-initiated-by-or-to-the-active/m-p/148941#M49692</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks! l always thought all sessions are floating/synchronised but looks like it is not the case&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:13:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-sessions-synchronization-initiated-by-or-to-the-active/m-p/148941#M49692</guid>
      <dc:creator>TranceforLife</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-22T16:13:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA sessions synchronization initiated by or to the Active.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-sessions-synchronization-initiated-by-or-to-the-active/m-p/148946#M49693</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes that is correct.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Learning-Articles/Why-Does-BGP-Have-to-Be-Reestablished-After-a-Failover/ta-p/54340" target="_blank"&gt; https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Learning-Articles/Why-Does-BGP-Have-to-Be-Reestablished-After-a-Failover/ta-p/54340&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Graceful restart can help I think.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Kiwi.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:25:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-sessions-synchronization-initiated-by-or-to-the-active/m-p/148946#M49693</guid>
      <dc:creator>kiwi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-22T16:25:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA sessions synchronization initiated by or to the Active.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-sessions-synchronization-initiated-by-or-to-the-active/m-p/148965#M49699</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The sessions are getting reestablished&amp;nbsp;automatically (at least can confirm with BGP and IPSec VPN). Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:31:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-sessions-synchronization-initiated-by-or-to-the-active/m-p/148965#M49699</guid>
      <dc:creator>TranceforLife</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-22T16:31:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

