<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IPSEC VPN ECMP - Issue in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ipsec-vpn-ecmp-issue/m-p/153880#M50743</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Unfortunaltely not, and it seems that I have the same issue with GlobalProtect.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have one tunnel with static IP, and I did a workeranoud - putted static route to this particular IP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In case of other tunnels, I putted also static routes as a temporary solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But of course it's not what I want to have.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas how to exactply configure PBR?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried with:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Zone Internet, Source IP 2.2.2.2 forwarded to e1/4 - but it doesn't work....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Przemek&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:31:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PrzemyslawCiborowski</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-04-24T16:31:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPSEC VPN ECMP - Issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ipsec-vpn-ecmp-issue/m-p/153853#M50737</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Collegues,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let imagine the following situation:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PA Firewall connected to two ISP, e1/1 - 1.1.1.1 and e1/4 - 2.2.2.2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Default virtual router with ECMP configured with weights e1/1-50 and e1/4-50.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IPSEC tunnel configured to the remote site, IKE Gateway configured on interface e1/4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tunnel is green, everything seems to be fine... but:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see around 50% packets lost.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;During troubleshooting I see that half of the ESP packets goes via e1/1 and other half via e1/4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pacekts which goes via e1/1 has IP address of e1/4 (2.2.2.2) and are lost.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I assume that I could use a PBF to resolve this issue, am I right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Przemek&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:04:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ipsec-vpn-ecmp-issue/m-p/153853#M50737</guid>
      <dc:creator>PrzemyslawCiborowski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-24T15:04:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPSEC VPN ECMP - Issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ipsec-vpn-ecmp-issue/m-p/153876#M50740</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yup,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PBF is going to be the best way to actually resolve this. I imagine that the remote site has a static IP?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:05:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ipsec-vpn-ecmp-issue/m-p/153876#M50740</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-24T16:05:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPSEC VPN ECMP - Issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ipsec-vpn-ecmp-issue/m-p/153880#M50743</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Unfortunaltely not, and it seems that I have the same issue with GlobalProtect.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have one tunnel with static IP, and I did a workeranoud - putted static route to this particular IP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In case of other tunnels, I putted also static routes as a temporary solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But of course it's not what I want to have.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas how to exactply configure PBR?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried with:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Zone Internet, Source IP 2.2.2.2 forwarded to e1/4 - but it doesn't work....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Przemek&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:31:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ipsec-vpn-ecmp-issue/m-p/153880#M50743</guid>
      <dc:creator>PrzemyslawCiborowski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-24T16:31:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPSEC VPN ECMP - Issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ipsec-vpn-ecmp-issue/m-p/154000#M50785</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Drawing1.png" style="width: 800px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/8925iD2F1BB73914B2B06/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Drawing1.png" alt="Drawing1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I enclosed a drawing to make it more clear.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On IKE GW local interface is configured to e1/4 - so all IKE1 traffic goes well (green line).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately ESP packets are load balanced and goes via e1/1 and e1/4 (orange lines).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I have to do is to force PA to send ESP packets via e1/4 interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ESP packets always have correct IP source address (2.2.2.2) only issue is that half of it goes via e1/1 interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance for your help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Przemek&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:56:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ipsec-vpn-ecmp-issue/m-p/154000#M50785</guid>
      <dc:creator>PrzemyslawCiborowski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-25T08:56:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPSEC VPN ECMP - Issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ipsec-vpn-ecmp-issue/m-p/166526#M53348</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Traffic generated on the firewall, like in this case doesn't work with the PBR.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I fiexed the problem by configuring two Virtual Routers - each one for a provider.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then instead of ECMP I configured a load sharing with redundancy (for internet traffic, not for the vpn tunnels).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Przemek.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 13:10:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ipsec-vpn-ecmp-issue/m-p/166526#M53348</guid>
      <dc:creator>PrzemyslawCiborowski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-14T13:10:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

