<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: OSPF adjacencies flapping caused by minor changes in Virtual Router. in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ospf-adjacencies-flapping-caused-by-minor-changes-in-virtual/m-p/156626#M51426</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;nextgenhappines,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I described, creating int/subint not cause flapping, but creating/deletting area, even without interfaces, leads to flapping.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My design assumes creating a new area for new DMZ.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tested this case on PA-500&amp;nbsp;with software from 5.0.0 to 7.1.17, issue still exists.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So sad, it seems we'll have to make new design.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 10:50:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>VAntonenko</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-05-15T10:50:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>OSPF adjacencies flapping caused by minor changes in Virtual Router.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ospf-adjacencies-flapping-caused-by-minor-changes-in-virtual/m-p/156338#M51323</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is a question about OSPF adjacency flapping caused by minor changes in OSPF process.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I&amp;nbsp;planned data-center deployment of PA-5060 HA-cluster. In this plan PA-5060 needs to be attached to OSPF AREA 0, and multiple NSSA areas in different security &amp;nbsp;zones. Number of multiple areas non constant and in will be increasing in the future with deploying new DMZs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When i configured this, i noticed that some changes in OSPF causes adjacancy reestablishing with peers when configuration is commiting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Creating new interface/subinterface and attacing it to existent OSPF area commits without interruption.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Creating new area, even without interfaces belongs to it, commits with reestablishing all existent OSPF adjacancies and service interruption.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Precisely OSPF peers receives one-way hello from PA (hello packet with empty neighbors list) and goes to Init state.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this scenario deploying of any new DMZ will cause service interruption in whole data-center segment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this a normal behaviour of PA?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are&amp;nbsp;there any workarounds? GR or something.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I found an article in community.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Management-Articles/Commit-Causes-OSPF-Adjacencies-to-go-Down/ta-p/53408" target="_blank"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Management-Articles/Commit-Causes-OSPF-Adjacencies-to-go-Down/ta-p/53408&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But it dated 2012. Is this fixed now?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 07:12:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ospf-adjacencies-flapping-caused-by-minor-changes-in-virtual/m-p/156338#M51323</guid>
      <dc:creator>VMAntonenko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-12T07:12:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OSPF adjacencies flapping caused by minor changes in Virtual Router.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ospf-adjacencies-flapping-caused-by-minor-changes-in-virtual/m-p/156527#M51391</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If this is still an issue, try testing with using eBGP and private ASN for your DMZ segments instead.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2017 13:59:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ospf-adjacencies-flapping-caused-by-minor-changes-in-virtual/m-p/156527#M51391</guid>
      <dc:creator>pulukas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-13T13:59:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OSPF adjacencies flapping caused by minor changes in Virtual Router.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ospf-adjacencies-flapping-caused-by-minor-changes-in-virtual/m-p/156548#M51400</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I believe that issue is already resolved back in 6.0 or 6.1. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I am running on 7.1.9, I don't think I see any OSPF adjacencies flapping when we add or delete interface|subnet..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;E&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2017 22:44:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ospf-adjacencies-flapping-caused-by-minor-changes-in-virtual/m-p/156548#M51400</guid>
      <dc:creator>nextgenhappines</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-13T22:44:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OSPF adjacencies flapping caused by minor changes in Virtual Router.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ospf-adjacencies-flapping-caused-by-minor-changes-in-virtual/m-p/156626#M51426</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;nextgenhappines,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I described, creating int/subint not cause flapping, but creating/deletting area, even without interfaces, leads to flapping.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My design assumes creating a new area for new DMZ.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tested this case on PA-500&amp;nbsp;with software from 5.0.0 to 7.1.17, issue still exists.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So sad, it seems we'll have to make new design.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 10:50:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ospf-adjacencies-flapping-caused-by-minor-changes-in-virtual/m-p/156626#M51426</guid>
      <dc:creator>VAntonenko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-15T10:50:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

