<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Changing HA Active/Active to Active/Passive in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/changing-ha-active-active-to-active-passive/m-p/159529#M52132</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I was wondering if anyone has changed HA from AA to AP and if so were there any problems doing so? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 19:17:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>s996kingsm</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-06-05T19:17:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Changing HA Active/Active to Active/Passive</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/changing-ha-active-active-to-active-passive/m-p/159529#M52132</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I was wondering if anyone has changed HA from AA to AP and if so were there any problems doing so? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 19:17:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/changing-ha-active-active-to-active-passive/m-p/159529#M52132</guid>
      <dc:creator>s996kingsm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-05T19:17:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Changing HA Active/Active to Active/Passive</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/changing-ha-active-active-to-active-passive/m-p/159611#M52141</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For this transition you will need to monitor and know the actual traffic patterns among the A/A interfaces in the zones. &amp;nbsp;In A/A all interfaces pass traffic and that traffic can be asymmetrical. &amp;nbsp;So there are two possible problem areas in the conversion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Passive device interfaces down&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have connections that go through what will be the passive firewall these connections will be lost when it goes from active to passive. &amp;nbsp;The ports are link up but no traffic passes. &amp;nbsp;So when this happens you need to be sure network devices that go through the now passive firewall will see the active firewall path as available.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Asymmetrical traffic&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Similarly, traffic that comes in from various zone interfaces will now only see one instead of two options. &amp;nbsp;They all must be able to find the alternative path over to the active firewall where they formally used the passive.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Most of these issues will come up only if you have the A/A firewalls directly connected to other routers as an only path link. &amp;nbsp;If the A/A firewalls connect to a switching matrix and share the VLAN in the respective zones, you likely won't have any issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you post a diagram of your site we can help you be sure.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 23:48:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/changing-ha-active-active-to-active-passive/m-p/159611#M52141</guid>
      <dc:creator>pulukas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-05T23:48:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

