<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Application overrides in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/application-overrides/m-p/162457#M52701</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;AppID will always try to identify the most accurate definition of an application&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;so if you write a custom app that triggers on a signature, the custom app should be triggered&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;if you can only provide some ports and the application behaves like web-browsing, web-browsing will be more accurate&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;the 'other' way is to use app override&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;why don't you want the PA's to inspect the flow? if you're accidentally hitting vulnerabilities, you can create override (in the threat/av/as), if AppID is the issue you can set up packetcapture and write signatures to properly identify the custom apps and no longer have the override issue&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;here's an artiicle that may help&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A title="Getting Started: Custom applications and app override" href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Featured-Articles/Getting-Started-Custom-applications-and-app-override/ta-p/71635" target="_blank"&gt;Getting Started: Custom applications and app override&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 07:39:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-06-21T07:39:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Application overrides</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/application-overrides/m-p/162413#M52698</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I ran ito the 150 application over rides limit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At my location I have a lot of java app running, they normally provide a http interface a JMX and RMI and https interface. and when you have 15 -20 of these that suchs up a lot of application override&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't want the PA's inspecting the flows.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First I tried creating my custom application and provided the ports. But cause it is HTTP traffic the PA;s would classify it as web-browsing. &amp;nbsp;I don't want this. So I found the only way to over ride this was to use applicaiton overrides.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So for auditing I created an application over ride for each port and application......&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now I am stuck ... added my 151 applicaiton override in panorama and tried to push out and it failed ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now I am rethinking. &amp;nbsp;Currenty thinking I might group my applicaiton overrides. &amp;nbsp;For example all the applicaitons have a http port and typically a RMI and JMX port. &amp;nbsp;I thought I could have a generic JMX port over ride and lump in all the port numbers in the application override object.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;then my next tricky thing was create a custom applicaiton say JMX port and sub applications say JMX app1, JMX app2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So applicaiton override would say applicaiton override is JMX and hopefully because jmx has children custom apps called jmx app1 and jmxapp2 it will pick them based upon the port number .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or &amp;nbsp;is there any other way of doing this ??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is there a way to force my custom applicataions to have higher priority over the inbuild ones - especially web browser&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:13:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/application-overrides/m-p/162413#M52698</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex_Samad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-21T00:13:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Application overrides</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/application-overrides/m-p/162457#M52701</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;AppID will always try to identify the most accurate definition of an application&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;so if you write a custom app that triggers on a signature, the custom app should be triggered&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;if you can only provide some ports and the application behaves like web-browsing, web-browsing will be more accurate&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;the 'other' way is to use app override&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;why don't you want the PA's to inspect the flow? if you're accidentally hitting vulnerabilities, you can create override (in the threat/av/as), if AppID is the issue you can set up packetcapture and write signatures to properly identify the custom apps and no longer have the override issue&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;here's an artiicle that may help&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A title="Getting Started: Custom applications and app override" href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Featured-Articles/Getting-Started-Custom-applications-and-app-override/ta-p/71635" target="_blank"&gt;Getting Started: Custom applications and app override&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 07:39:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/application-overrides/m-p/162457#M52701</guid>
      <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-21T07:39:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

