<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ACC Dashboard in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/acc-dashboard/m-p/164676#M53084</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/17404"&gt;@clyde.franklin&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To everything that I've ever heard or read, risk is stirctly by app. You could manually do this if you ran a custom report and specified rule and risk and just averaged the risk values; but I don't think that the firewall will do this for you.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 15:17:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-07-05T15:17:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ACC Dashboard</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/acc-dashboard/m-p/164666#M53083</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So I know that within in ACC dashboard there is a Risk&amp;nbsp; Score Displayed. There is also&amp;nbsp; Rule list that&amp;nbsp; that shows&amp;nbsp; risky app assosciated&amp;nbsp; rule name . My question&amp;nbsp; is&amp;nbsp; does Panorama give you overall risk score&amp;nbsp; for the rule itself? For example what if I have a mix of Risky apps for Risk 3, 4 ,5. Will it give me a avg risk score for the&amp;nbsp; actual rule (not the app)&amp;nbsp; based on having several differnent risks in 1 rule.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 14:41:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/acc-dashboard/m-p/164666#M53083</guid>
      <dc:creator>clyde.franklin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-05T14:41:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACC Dashboard</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/acc-dashboard/m-p/164676#M53084</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/17404"&gt;@clyde.franklin&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To everything that I've ever heard or read, risk is stirctly by app. You could manually do this if you ran a custom report and specified rule and risk and just averaged the risk values; but I don't think that the firewall will do this for you.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 15:17:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/acc-dashboard/m-p/164676#M53084</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-05T15:17:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACC Dashboard</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/acc-dashboard/m-p/164677#M53085</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok I was doing some reading. And I see there is a partnership between Tufin and Palo Alto;however seems more catered towards automation.&amp;nbsp; I know Tufin does risk reports on the Palo Alto firewalls based on tcp/upd ports specified by industry best practices. But I see no correlation where Tufin somehow integrated with Palo appipedia and runs reporting based on applications designated by Palo Alto&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 15:22:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/acc-dashboard/m-p/164677#M53085</guid>
      <dc:creator>clyde.franklin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-05T15:22:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

