<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PAN 7.1.9 aes-256-cbc vs PAN 6.1.10 aes256 in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pan-7-1-9-aes-256-cbc-vs-pan-6-1-10-aes256/m-p/166249#M53298</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/54718"&gt;@palomed&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, if you choose aes-256-cbc in 7.1.x, this will be the same as aes-256 in 6.1.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Remo&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 01:53:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Remo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-07-13T01:53:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PAN 7.1.9 aes-256-cbc vs PAN 6.1.10 aes256</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pan-7-1-9-aes-256-cbc-vs-pan-6-1-10-aes256/m-p/166241#M53297</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I need to move a tunnel from a PAN with 6.1.10. The tunnel today uses aes256 for IPSec crypto and for IKE. The tunnel established fine to our biz partner.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In configuring the tunnel on the other PAN with 7.1.9 I notice that my options are aes-256-cbc or aes-256-gcm for IPSec and IKE Crypto, Add offered aes-256-cbc. My question: If I select aes-256-cbc for both should the tunnel likely remain compatible with the biz parnter if it worked before? I think they're using Cisco but not certain actually. TY&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 00:45:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pan-7-1-9-aes-256-cbc-vs-pan-6-1-10-aes256/m-p/166241#M53297</guid>
      <dc:creator>palomed</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-13T00:45:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PAN 7.1.9 aes-256-cbc vs PAN 6.1.10 aes256</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pan-7-1-9-aes-256-cbc-vs-pan-6-1-10-aes256/m-p/166249#M53298</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/54718"&gt;@palomed&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, if you choose aes-256-cbc in 7.1.x, this will be the same as aes-256 in 6.1.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Remo&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 01:53:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pan-7-1-9-aes-256-cbc-vs-pan-6-1-10-aes256/m-p/166249#M53298</guid>
      <dc:creator>Remo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-13T01:53:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

