<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Can PA-200 or PA-500 be infected with Win32/Hupigon? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/can-pa-200-or-pa-500-be-infected-with-win32-hupigon/m-p/167197#M53430</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/62578"&gt;@bokeke&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You wouldn't expect to see that signature with the PA device. It could be that it's a false positive for the signature that they are using to identify that traffic. Win32/Hupigon isn't known to infect linux based devices.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:42:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-07-19T15:42:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Can PA-200 or PA-500 be infected with Win32/Hupigon?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/can-pa-200-or-pa-500-be-infected-with-win32-hupigon/m-p/167066#M53420</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I had a puzzle today from my ISP suggesting that they are receing traffic infected with Win32/Hupigon from the management interface of my&amp;nbsp;PA-200s and PA-500s. I don't route user data through the management interface. So, is it really possible that PA-200 or PA-500 can&amp;nbsp;be&amp;nbsp;infected with Win32/Hupigon?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 22:07:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/can-pa-200-or-pa-500-be-infected-with-win32-hupigon/m-p/167066#M53420</guid>
      <dc:creator>bokeke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-18T22:07:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can PA-200 or PA-500 be infected with Win32/Hupigon?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/can-pa-200-or-pa-500-be-infected-with-win32-hupigon/m-p/167197#M53430</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/62578"&gt;@bokeke&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You wouldn't expect to see that signature with the PA device. It could be that it's a false positive for the signature that they are using to identify that traffic. Win32/Hupigon isn't known to infect linux based devices.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:42:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/can-pa-200-or-pa-500-be-infected-with-win32-hupigon/m-p/167197#M53430</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-19T15:42:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

