<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Panoram and Clusters in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panoram-and-clusters/m-p/176520#M55184</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just take in consideration taht Panora ma aim is to simplify config deployment between "large" number of PA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In your case, you have only one cluster. between cluster member, confif is replicated automatically.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then, my opinion, if you have only on cluster, integrate them in the Panorama and for management, change of context.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In parallele, your panaorma allow you to consolidate all your logs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The best is the ennemy of the good.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rgds&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;V.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:50:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>VinceM</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-09-14T11:50:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Panoram and Clusters</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panoram-and-clusters/m-p/176213#M55126</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;HI&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sort of asked this before, but with a couple more months of experienace, I am back again&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I have a cluster I want to manage with panorama&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Object and polices work great... templates not so good.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I have a cluster setup for Global protect, but I have to duplicate my certificates, interfaces and zones between 2 templates. &amp;nbsp;because things are linked to a router and I have 2 different routers with unique routerids and I have some unquiue stuff as well, the HA ip address, the management port &amp;lt;&amp;lt; this includes a management port certifcate which comes from panorama.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so I am thinking I am going to move all the unique stuff into management from within the PA directly remove panorama completely. &amp;nbsp;then I have 1 template that address all the needs and I will only need to comfigure stuff once and not twice .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and I am thinking of moving away from unique names for my routers go back to using default, so when i create agg ports or other interfaces I can just assigne to default.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I find this a very big short coming of the template system for panorama. &amp;nbsp;atleast if when you used the interface it looked at the stack for references to things I it would make it easier ....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 21:43:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panoram-and-clusters/m-p/176213#M55126</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex_Samad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-12T21:43:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Panoram and Clusters</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panoram-and-clusters/m-p/176520#M55184</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just take in consideration taht Panora ma aim is to simplify config deployment between "large" number of PA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In your case, you have only one cluster. between cluster member, confif is replicated automatically.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then, my opinion, if you have only on cluster, integrate them in the Panorama and for management, change of context.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In parallele, your panaorma allow you to consolidate all your logs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The best is the ennemy of the good.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rgds&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;V.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:50:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panoram-and-clusters/m-p/176520#M55184</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceM</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-14T11:50:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

