<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Allow Box Enterprise without allowing Box Consumer in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/allow-box-enterprise-without-allowing-box-consumer/m-p/179625#M55712</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/6797"&gt;@j.bronson&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is what I would do.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Create a rule that temporarly gives your IP or user-id access to anything.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Navigate to one of these Box Enterprise links and see if the App-ID gets recognized as boxnet-enterprise-access.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the application gets identified correctly then all you need to do is get rid of your URL block, if not then it's likely this wouldn't really work without a lot of work on your end as that pretty much tells us you aren't doing SSL-Decryption.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want access to Box Enterprise links but you are blocking box through URL-Filtering, this isn't going to work. You are essentially cutting off access to box before the firewall even has a chance to decide if you are utilzing box enterprise or not.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2017 16:49:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-10-02T16:49:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Allow Box Enterprise without allowing Box Consumer</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/allow-box-enterprise-without-allowing-box-consumer/m-p/179609#M55710</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Box is getting blocked for employees.&amp;nbsp; However, more of our business partners are using Box Enterprise.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are using URL and application filtering.&amp;nbsp; Looking through the list of applications, I found boxnet-enterprise-access and added it to allowed applications, but when I try to go the Box site of a Box Enterprise user/company, I'm still gettting a URL block.&amp;nbsp; I don't want to add an exception by category or by URL as that will allow access to all of Box.&amp;nbsp; I only want Enterprise.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2017 15:55:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/allow-box-enterprise-without-allowing-box-consumer/m-p/179609#M55710</guid>
      <dc:creator>j.bronson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-02T15:55:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Allow Box Enterprise without allowing Box Consumer</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/allow-box-enterprise-without-allowing-box-consumer/m-p/179625#M55712</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/6797"&gt;@j.bronson&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is what I would do.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Create a rule that temporarly gives your IP or user-id access to anything.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Navigate to one of these Box Enterprise links and see if the App-ID gets recognized as boxnet-enterprise-access.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the application gets identified correctly then all you need to do is get rid of your URL block, if not then it's likely this wouldn't really work without a lot of work on your end as that pretty much tells us you aren't doing SSL-Decryption.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want access to Box Enterprise links but you are blocking box through URL-Filtering, this isn't going to work. You are essentially cutting off access to box before the firewall even has a chance to decide if you are utilzing box enterprise or not.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2017 16:49:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/allow-box-enterprise-without-allowing-box-consumer/m-p/179625#M55712</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-02T16:49:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Allow Box Enterprise without allowing Box Consumer</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/allow-box-enterprise-without-allowing-box-consumer/m-p/313255#M80902</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That is what I usually do when troubleshooting, create a rule specifically for my traffic, access the sites and then review firewall traffic to determine the application used.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 01:10:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/allow-box-enterprise-without-allowing-box-consumer/m-p/313255#M80902</guid>
      <dc:creator>rkoenig</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-27T01:10:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Allow Box Enterprise without allowing Box Consumer</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/allow-box-enterprise-without-allowing-box-consumer/m-p/570894#M115001</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The issue we are seeing is that even enterprise accounts use so many sub-URLs, that users are being blocked for some functions, even if they can access the main paid Box account. How would a rule (or rule set) allow full access to paid Box.com accounts, but still block access to free accounts? Is this possible?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2023 18:08:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/allow-box-enterprise-without-allowing-box-consumer/m-p/570894#M115001</guid>
      <dc:creator>CalebRaymer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-26T18:08:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

