<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Ignoring stateful Inspection - Asymetrical Routing in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ignoring-stateful-inspection-asymetrical-routing/m-p/184151#M56500</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;While this feature seams to be available, and supposedly works... it lacks granularity.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Source NAT in my experience is a far more elegant means of dealing with such scenarios.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks nonetheless !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ajaz Nawaz&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CCIE-RS#15721&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;JNCIE-SEC#254&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 11:33:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nawaza</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-10-27T11:33:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Ignoring stateful Inspection - Asymetrical Routing</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ignoring-stateful-inspection-asymetrical-routing/m-p/183604#M56411</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In asymetrical routing scenario where return packets arrive on different interface, is there a feature in Palo to accept the flow?.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ajaz Nawaz&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CCIE RS #15721&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;JNCIE-SEC #254&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 09:26:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ignoring-stateful-inspection-asymetrical-routing/m-p/183604#M56411</guid>
      <dc:creator>nawaza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-25T09:26:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ignoring stateful Inspection - Asymetrical Routing</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ignoring-stateful-inspection-asymetrical-routing/m-p/183611#M56412</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, you can enable to allow asymmetric flow globally or per zone.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Configuration-Articles/How-to-Set-the-Palo-Alto-Networks-Firewall-to-Allow-non-Syn/ta-p/62868" target="_blank"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Configuration-Articles/How-to-Set-the-Palo-Alto-Networks-Firewall-to-Allow-non-Syn/ta-p/62868&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 09:31:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ignoring-stateful-inspection-asymetrical-routing/m-p/183611#M56412</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anon1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-25T09:31:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ignoring stateful Inspection - Asymetrical Routing</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ignoring-stateful-inspection-asymetrical-routing/m-p/184151#M56500</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;While this feature seams to be available, and supposedly works... it lacks granularity.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Source NAT in my experience is a far more elegant means of dealing with such scenarios.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks nonetheless !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ajaz Nawaz&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CCIE-RS#15721&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;JNCIE-SEC#254&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 11:33:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ignoring-stateful-inspection-asymetrical-routing/m-p/184151#M56500</guid>
      <dc:creator>nawaza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-27T11:33:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

